M
mixsit
Well-known member
Um.. at least parts of it will be.just because the snare transient in the overheads occurs later in time than the transient on the snare close mic doesnt make it "out of phase".
Um.. at least parts of it will be.just because the snare transient in the overheads occurs later in time than the transient on the snare close mic doesnt make it "out of phase".
Um.. at least parts of it will be.
Yes, agree completely- We have differences in position response patterns, and time paths from width differences and external reflections all messing with our 'text book alignments..i realize this. my point was, when dealing with complex waveforms in this situation, timeshifting does not "fix" phase problems, in only changes them.
You seem to actually be making the OP's case here. It's exactly because we have rather full spectrum (plus the multi-path) coming off the kit and not simple signal -that only certain frequency intervals at given distance differences can be both 'out of time' and in phase right?..if you have two simple wave forms happening at different points in time, they are still in phase as long as they rise and fall together.... therefore, timing discrepancies between tracks do not equal phase problems as the original poster suggests. its just not that simple.
I'm not sure he even meant anything that complicated. Simply put, ignoring multipath, multicapture and other multisyllabic words, and just looking at the definitions straignt on: if you have, say, a 1kHz signal, any time shift evenly divisible by 1/1000th of a second will result in a signal that is phase coherent with the original signal.You seem to actually be making the OP's case here. It's exactly because we have rather full spectrum (plus the multi-path) coming off the kit and not simple signal -that only certain frequency intervals at given distance differences can be both 'out of time' and in phase right?