N
Neeps
New member
bilco said:I listened through some not so great monitors, (Roland MA 8s) and then through my AT headphones. I was leaning towards A with the mp3 files and then chose B again with the wave files.
Then I read that Preamp A was the RNP. I have mixed emotions about this. I have an RNP and I love it with an SM 57 on my voice. I am not getting anywhere as good a result on acoustic as you are though. I am using an SM81 on a Martin Shenandoah D2832 and I just can't get a good sound through the RNP compared to some cheaper preamps I tried. It is boxy. Now that I hear your clip, I realize it has to be either the guitar, my mic technique, the room or all 3 combined. I have work to do and more to learn I guess.
I have to say that although I leaned toward the RNP, I think I would have been satisfied with the DMP3 as well. It may not have worked as well on my vocals, but it sounds great on the acoustic guitar to me. If I could get a sound that good, I would be satisfied.
bilco
It's probably the room combined with the fact that the msh-1 is omni so I could mic reasonably close without a proximity boost. I also think the new strings can be heard shining through. To me that's important for getting a good acoustic sound. My Norman is not an expensive guitar it only cost 99 british pounds (about $200) but they are well made instruments that can sound good even if the action isn't as great as a more expensive guitar.