ram
guess again about the ram, I have a hp pavillion 9900 , with an athlon xp in it. runs at 1.2 ghz. I have an Audigy 2 zs in it,
a radeon 9600 XT and the original cd/dvd burners/readers. Was top of the line 3 years ago... now the parents have a brand new pavillion with an Athlon 64
anyways, Its got a 60 gig hard drive, and I only have 12 gigs used up. Most of my files are music and picture files. The thing runs pretty darned slow, it has 256 mb of ram. NOW my other computer, an older 1999 Compaq deskpro en series, with a slot one pentium 3, running at 1 ghz ( yes the harder to find slot one p3

) and it has 384 mb of ram. I have the original cd rom in it, a philips dvd rom , soundblaster live x-gamer 5.1, and a modded n-vidia Geforce mx/mx400 64 mb card. OK this computer absolutly flies, through gameing with high graphics ( while it has some glitches on full graphics games, that is due to the g.c being
a mx400 instead of a 9600XT

) anyways.. my thing here is that the pc outruns the HP. I have the same amount of audio files, and pictures on this pc as on the hp. ALSO the hard drive is filled to capacity, its only a 10 gig, so i dont have as many games as on the other one. But it still outruns the hp, and when I upgrade the hp to 512 it will probably outrun the compaq. Even if you have an older processor, its good to give it as much ram as it can handel, because you use ram primarly in files such as music, gameing, and sound/graphics related stuff.
quick note as well, I have windows XP on both pcs, the MINIMUM requierment for windows xp is 256 mb or ram for plain system use! when you have xp and are running other stuff with only 256, you only have about 128 mb of useable ram for your programs to use... so if your program says it needs 256 mb of ram, you really need at least 384 with xp.. other that that shouldnt be a prob for windows 9series/2k.