Plug-ins: VST vs DX.

  • Thread starter Thread starter VTgreen81
  • Start date Start date
VTgreen81

VTgreen81

Active member
are VST of higher sound quality? Does one format have better selection? Does one use less resource? What does a wrapper do?

My software does not support VST, but I could use VST plugs with a VST-DX wrapper right?
 
VTgreen81 said:
are VST of higher sound quality? Does one format have better selection? Does one use less resource? What does a wrapper do?

My software does not support VST, but I could use VST plugs with a VST-DX wrapper right?

Not an expert on this subject, but...

I don't believe VST is inherently better sounding than DX, it's simply a different format. VST has been around longer and, hence, has wider support so the answer to your second question is yes, you will find a wider selection of VSTs. As far as resources goes, I think the answer to that is more a function of the particular plug-in than anything specific to the format. IOW, a VST reverb will be more resource hungry than a DX chorus.

A wrapper is a small program that "wraps" your DX plug-ins so that they appear as VSTs to the host program, thus allowing you to use them within a program that doesn't natively have DX plug-in support.

Ted
 
Back
Top