Pleuse anyone help me !!

  • Thread starter Thread starter ventura33
  • Start date Start date
V

ventura33

New member
Hello my friends can anyone help me ?
im very confused with connections between 2 or 3 computers the new plugins are very cpu Hungry
i need more cpu
whow can i connect 2 or 3 computers toghether ? it is Possible ?
I have a Mac G5 With mac osx tiger , a PC 2.4 With XP and a Laptoop PC Centrino with Windows Vista
On a Mac i have the Protools HD And in the others i have cubase SX with plugins
i want to send the signal of the plugins to the Master computer G5 With Protools
The Question is:
Its possible connect the 2 or 3 computers with gigabyte ethernet ?
Does he work?
How i connect ?
can i connect one Mac with one or 2 PCs ? Those the protools accept the ethernet connections ?
If the connections are possible its audio is sending or only Midi information from the computers slave ?
What i want is use the other computers like a effects processors , and mix in the protools using some plugins in protools and using other plugins from the others computers.
its possible use more than 1 effect plugin in the slave computers ?

Sorry the confused and i think its to hard for you understand , because my english its not as good.
and maybe this ideia its for the next generation not for my generation maybe in 3030 year

Thank people !!!!

Thanks again and pleuse help me

Victor

Portugal
 
yup - this doesn't work the way you want it to....need more CPU? buy more cpu
 
Try AUNetSend and AUNetReceive, but I've never actually tried using them....
 
AUnetsend etc only works with mac and still isn't what he's wanting to do..

he's literally wanting to use the processors of 3 computers and group into one use via ethernet...

aunetsend will just send the output to another computer, not use its hardware resources
 
MadHatterTCM said:
AUnetsend etc only works with mac and still isn't what he's wanting to do..

he's literally wanting to use the processors of 3 computers and group into one use via ethernet...

aunetsend will just send the output to another computer, not use its hardware resources
Click to expand...

Oh, sorry, I missed that he wanted to use PCs.... But yes, it does effectively do the same thing. You run power-hungry plugs on another machine, then route the signal back. I don't know, however, if they support latency compensation. If not, you'd be in a world of hurt.

Your best bet, honestly, is to freeze tracks. That way, the effects get applied to a copy of the track audio, then are disabled so they aren't wasting CPU.
 
If you were working on all PCs, you could simply use www.fxteleport.com

Your best bet is to freeze (bounce) the tracks.
It's a bit of a pain, old-school and slightly time-consuming but it WORKS.
 
or try one of those newfangled standalone plugin processors.
 
Peronally, I'd just use the vista pc (HOPE it's dual core with at least 2gb ram).

That's what I use and I use it with a line-6 toneport UX8 recording interface and MAGIX Pro-grade Software! Records 8 lines, BOATLOAD of VST's (and line6's are TOP notch), and no latency issues!

I recorded 8/8/4/4/1/1/1/1 track sessions (mixing total of 28 tracks with VST's- no problems).

Works for me!
 
This FXteleport program sounds like the ticket with one exception.

Nothing has caused more hiccups and headaches than having the NIC enabled on an DAW. That's the first thing I do, removing anything to do with networking.
Also the latency factor sounds a little iffy.

Also it is not listed as being compatible with Vista, not that it matters.
Speaking of Vista, I read in Information Week that MS is pushing up the release of Windows 7 to next year. Also I see XP SP3 is now being released to OEM's.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top