badgas
New member
Thanks for your post, Larry. Lemme say right off, I've been playing music over forty years, and know zillch about theory. Well, I know it, but not in the techie sense. To prove this inadaqucey on my part, let me state this.Larry_K said:I don't want to come in from left feild as a "newbie" here. I would just like to suggest that it is not always necessary to start and or end on "I" in progression of order. Inserting substitution chords at key points of a verse or chorus to lead you to the next section of the song is one "trick" I use to try and force myself away from the old I VI II V (Left out the m's,7's,9's,11's etc because they are voices that will be added to compliment the melody as they evolve)
What I am trying to say is, (I think) think outside the box... Now if a melody, lyrics happens to come first, it is even better, because then you can work the voicings of the notes in the "progression" and this will keep it "fresh" as long as the melody is fresh and works with the overall song you should end up with "music"
I'm going to have to redo all my l, lV, etc ideas if what you say it true.
Of all the progressions I posted, only four or five of them begin the progression with the 'l' chord. The other songs begin with other chords than the 'l' chord of the progression.
So, by what you are saying, if I play a song from a C progression,
l, miv, lV, V,
and begin the song in Am, miv, I would start the progression out like,
miv, V, l, lV, etc?
Ya know, the more I look at it, the righter I think you are.
Lemme know if this is right, ok?
I feel so dumb some times.