New. Unlearned. In need of Advice.

  • Thread starter Thread starter Chordorganblues
  • Start date Start date
Im pretty inexperienced at this but just as DAWs all record sound to the same quality I would imagine that they would also record as well as a standalones..
PCs arent built for a single purpose other than to run programmes and a sound recording programme is just as focused as a korg D3200 etc...Im not saying that your ears dont tell you different, I swear that ableton sounds better than sonar, but it doesnt..and I wouldnt imagine a standalone would produce a better recording than software..imho of course
 
Im pretty inexperienced at this but just as DAWs all record sound to the same quality I would imagine that they would also record as well as a standalones..
PCs arent built for a single purpose other than to run programmes and a sound recording programme is just as focused as a korg D3200 etc...Im not saying that your ears dont tell you different, I swear that ableton sounds better than sonar, but it doesnt..and I wouldnt imagine a standalone would produce a better recording than software..imho of course

kcearl: All DAWs are not created equally. Ableton may well sound better on your rig. There are so many factors involved in recording through your PC that it is virtually impossible to predict how well it will perform.
I would pretty well trust any Korg, Yamaha, Roland or Tascam (in that order) to record exactly what I put into it and never have to deal with latency, pops or glitches.
By the same token, many hours have been put into developing studio software which will bring out the very best in your recordings and in a fraction of the time.
Again, just my opinion too but I'm pretty well sold on using both the stand alone and PC in the manner I've described.
 
There has been some very good advice given. The very first piece of studio gear (and most often overlooked) to get is a good tuner. By good I mean accurate, doesn't need to be fancy. And press the issue that everyone use the same tuner, and use it frequently. Tuners will vary slightly so it is important that everyone use the same one. No matter what else you have remember, it has to sound good to start with in order for it to sound good when finished.
 
kcearl: All DAWs are not created equally. Ableton may well sound better on your rig.

I think you are MUCH more likely to hear a difference based on the hardware you are using than the software you are using. The audio that you are mixing in the computer was not created by the software- that is, audio comes in through the soundcard / interface converters and is simply played back by your software. The only point at which your software might impart its own "sound" is either what plug-ins you happen to have with your software and when it comes time for your software to combine all of your tracks into a final mixed-down track (the "sound' of various softwares has been debated since the begining of this website :p).

Certainly, there are some computer interfaces with good converters and some with bad. The same would hold true for the stand alone units.

I'll also agree, that the stand alones have some advantages- portability is good (although current laptops, certainly compete as portable). The purpose built stand alones also have the benifit of a factory designed combination of hardware and the internal software that runs it. SO, yeah, out of the box, a stand alone might simplify the time between unpackaging-to-making-your-first-recording.

HOWEVER, in the last 10 years or so that I've been a home-recordist, I've had FAR more trouble with the stand alone units, and the limitations in editing and file management are more than I can bear. I really think you overstate the issues that people have with computer based recording (not that you havent had your own troubles- beleive me, I've had trouble with a few stand-alones). Also, consider that the hardware and software have come a LONG way just in the past couple years for recording. Especially with the advent of the firewire interfaces. A decent, and relatively new computer coupled with a good interface or soundcard should yield little trouble in set-up or everyday use.

I don't think there is anything inherent in standalones that make them "record better" than the computer based counterparts. Personally, I think recording to a computer is much more intuitive once you get the hardware setup. Add the benifit of data management that you have with a computer (ability to move files and easily backup data). There aren't many people that I would recomend a stand alone to. I truly think computer is the way to go.

:)
 
thank you all for your great input.

my feeling is since i want to try using the mutli track recorder combined with PC editing first... i can always move to PC recording later if i want.

still a bit confused on the interface... what would be the purpose of an audio interface in this situation? cant i just connect the recorder to my PC with usb and edit the audio with a daw?
 
Back
Top