
kcearl
I see deaf people
Oh i have another three on my ipad...lol
I have five Daws if you include garageband...i had six but i removed sonar studio..ill be adding bitwig when it comes out, im kinda addicted a bit![]()
You just volunteered to be the official HR "What's the best DAW?" question answerer.![]()
Yet you've said, for you, "Reaper wins" (and haven't said why).
I agree, I agree !And BTW, apropos of nothing (and GrimTraveller will agree with me on this one....) when did recording software = DAW? A DAW, originally, was a system designed to record music - an actual collection of things, of which the 'puter, and software were a part, or an all in one box such as I used... it was a WORKSTATION.
I've yet to come across anyone who has gone through 5 or 6 demo versions purely for the purposes of testing them out to see which they prefer.My biggest issue with downloading and trying out software is that due to my lack of experience with this type of software, just playing around really doesn't tell me much.
And not only that, that they actually spent a considerable time getting to know the ins and outs of each. "So many DAWS {sorry, Armistice !} so little time.....".That's the problem with all of these "What's the best _______?" type of questions. They presume that someone has experience with a wide variety of _______ from which to make a comparison.
This is often the route people take that explains why they end up having used two or three programmes, unless you're a DAW junkie like KC, in which case you need no reason !I started with Cubase. Switched to Sonar when I switched to 64 bit. Switched back to Cubase because of problems with Sonar
^^^^This is the bottom line for me.^^^^ It's pretty much like anything else ¬> once you start to learn whatever on something, generally one of two things will happen. Either you just learn and after a while you become used to whatever it is you're learning on and don't question whether it's easy or hard. Or you find difficulties or get itchy feet and move onto an alternative.Pick one, learn it and move on to the next technical hurdle. Your DAW choice is the near the bottom of the list of things to worry about.
This is really the case with standalone DAWS. I remember when I was researching into digital recording back in 2003/4 I found the computer stuff hard to get together in my head. I liked some of the concepts but being an analogger I was perhaps still too close to that mindset and way of working. Then I discovered that they had standalone DAWs which seemed to me to be a wonderful halfway house between the cassette portastudio and the computer. I bought one {a Zoom MRS 1266} on a whim one day. It had all the bells and whistles but there were 2 things it couldn't do. In the grand scheme of things, they were minor. But for me they were deal breakers. I loved the MRS 1266 and it was one of only 2 DAWS that did backwards recording but you couldn't alter the speed or monitor non bouncing tracks during bouncing. I say it was minor in the grand scheme of things because hardly anyone you listen to in recording today uses varispeed or bounces onto one or two tracks but these are two mainstays for me.the reasons why I like it might be the exact reasons why someone else doesn't like it.
I AM DONE!
After spending 20 hours over the past 3 days watching tutorials and videos I can do it anymore.
I am going insane! First Logic, then Reaper and last but not least Protools. Finally shut it down, can't watch another tutorial and play with another program.
I settled on Logic. It seems like it works for me, I can feel it and it speaks to me.
In fact, I recorded a few tracks this afternoon and emailed to a friend who is an engineer. He said I did good.
Just a kind thank you to everyone who responded and helped. It made me realize that there is no one "best". But at this time, for me, Logic seems to work.
Bill