N-track or Cool Edit Pro

[Strat Man]

Have used N-track for about a year without problems but recently checked out CEP. Which is better, CEP seems to have a heap more options. Cost is not an object.

- Neill

 

[Whoopysnorp]

I've not checked out CEP since the release of version 2.0. I ditched CEP 1.2 for N-track.

 

[pgm]

CEP .......by far!

 

[musicsdarkangel]

n-track rocks


but so does cool edit pro

hmmmmm i'd choose Cool Edit Pro if I didn't have technical problems with it, BUT for now, N-track

 

[CrimsonWarlock]

If cost is not a problem, you should also check out Samplitude.

www.samplitude.com

Peter.

 

[c9-2001]

If cost is not a problem, you should also check out Samplitude.

www.samplitude.com

Peter.

aka logic...

if cost isn't an object get nuendo

out of those 2 i'd go with cep2

 

[Slackmaster2K]

CEP doesn't support VST. I use enough VST that any non-VST app is out of the question. Your requirements of course may differ! n-Track supports VST (and ASIO...I don't understand these anti-steinberg apps!)

Slackmaster 2000

 

[Tukkis]

N-Track is very good for the price

Cool Edit Pro 2 is more expensive but it has heaps more features

If price isn't important than I would go with Cool Edit Pro 2

Tukkis

 

[Slackmaster2K]

What are the "heaps more features" of CEP? I'm not being defensive, I'm just curious as I've never used it. User to user, what are the benefits of CEP over n-Track besides (I HOPE) stability? Do you think these benefits warrant 4X the cost to the average home recorder?

Slackmaster 2000

 

[Tukkis]

I shouldn't of said heaps more, just more.

N-track has lots of effects and CEP just builds on that.

go and check out some of the effects

http://www.syntrillium.com/cep/effects.html

Tukkis