you been hiding under a rock???
go here,
https://homerecording.com/bbs/showthread.php?t=180964
and when you get out 255 pages later, you'll know.
No, you're correct, but there is an apparent difference in the sound.I was of the understanding that the 84 was the same circuit as the 73 with more eq and no DI.
Is this incorrect?
Haven't been around much lately, but as I recall this group buy was about ribbon mics. Isnt the 73 Vintech's Neve clone?
No, you're correct, but there is an apparent difference in the sound.
Hmm.
I wonder why that would be.
Hmm.
I wonder why that would be.
Because all parts (including transformers) are low cost with tolarences that are probably 20%+
To build a pre-amp that has a consistant sound, the parts would cost 5 times more (at least).
Sweet! The DI was the reason I got the 73. Has anyone run an acoustic pickup through one yet?I brought a 73 to catalina with me. Killer DI!!!. I guess my brick will only be used for remotes.
Sweet! The DI was the reason I got the 73. Has anyone run an acoustic pickup through one yet?
Alex didn't like the bass boost of the 1073, but he did like the bass on the 1084. He loved the 1073 AND the 1084 on vocals, and he loved the 1073 for the DI as well.It sounds like what Harvey is saying is that the Pres sound different all settings being the same.
Maybe I'm missing something.
Harvey, would you say that if the EQ is disengaged, that the pres would sound different or is the more flexible EQ the reason.
It also seems to be that people are saying that they prefer the 1073 over the 1084.
Just curious.
I hear ya. So it might not be that every 84 sounds different than every 73?
That's also the reason I ordered a 310. But it might be nice to mix both if I wanted to.why when we can slap a 310 or 583 in front of it and run it through the 73's mic pre?
That's also the reason I ordered a 310. But it might be nice to mix both if I wanted to.