stetto said:
I think that working from the bottom up is a great way to develop the ear and know better what you want when it comes to choosing a more expensive investment...
Oh, back to my point; If you're just starting out and have the patience, the cheaper/harsher/muddier mics are a good learning tool. They teach you to learn and understand your signal chain...
Eric
Well, you can go that route, but I wouldn't recommend it.
I'd like to have a pair of high end condenser omnis that cost about $2000 each. Instead, I've located the best mikes I can find that I can also afford. My RE-55s cost less than $100 each and the SM-80 capsules were about the same. I don't think it makes a bit of sense to waste time on crappy sounding mikes. You will learn something with good mikes or bad, but you will learn what things really sound like and how to record them better with good mikes.
Now, if learning is what you want and you want to be well rounded, you will ultimately want to end up with at least one dynamic cardioid (say, SM-57), one SDC (say, SM-81), one LDC multi-pattern condenser (uhh, you name it, too many choices) and one figure-8 ribbon mike and maybe a true omni (little 1/4" cheapies if nothing else). Better yet, two of each and a copy of the New Stereo Soundbook, since you just might want to know something about stereo recordings.
I can't see any point to purposely choosing inferior tools. There are some good, cheap examples of several of these categories, and it makes sense to me to use all the information available to find ones that best serve your purposes. I also think there is a lot of benefit when learning to have an accurate omni mike (better yet a pair of them) because it offers you the chance to really listen and learn what things really sound like at various mike placements as a reference so that when you use other mikes you have that point of reference to compare to. Otherwise, you're just kind of flailing about.
Cheers,
Otto