Michael Jackson recording

  • Thread starter Thread starter Downside Studio
  • Start date Start date
Downside Studio

Downside Studio

New member
I heard the other day that Michael Jackson mayby had to sell his rights to the Beatlestuff becuase he had borrowed 300 million dollar from SONY for recording his latest album.

What the hell did he need 300 million dollar for. If I hire a topstudio it will cost me about $2500 a day. Lets say I hire it for a whole year. I'm bound to get a discount than so lets say I pay $2000* 365 = $730.000 Include some musicians and some food and mayby a phone bill and it will cost him like 5 million a year. That means he could record for like 60 years.

I've got to get this dude as a client.
 
You have to add in the expense of all the zoo animals as well.
 
You have to add in the expense of all the zoo animals as well.
Click to expand...

Actually I did.

$730.000 Include some musicians and some food and mayby a phone bill and it will cost him like 5 million a year.
Click to expand...

That was

$ 730.000 studio
$ 770.000 musicians
$ 2 phonebill
$3499,998 zoo animal expenses
 
Other additional cost's include........

....plastic surgery upkeep, Diamonds for Liz Taylor, Acting Lessons
for McCauley Culkin and maintenance for the Elephant-Man bones!
 
Hey...................mayby he had to buy a ECM8000 for each of his animals to stick it up their asses.

That would explain the other 295 million dollars
 
Don't forget those payments he's still making to those kids and their parents for not proceding with the court suits!!!
 
I know quite a few of the people involved, and they are nothing but a bunch of rats as far as I'm concerned, as they take him for every penny. Saying that, he lets them.........
 
sjoko2 said:
I know quite a few of the people involved, and they are nothing but a bunch of rats as far as I'm concerned, as they take him for every penny. Saying that, he lets them.........
Click to expand...

Yup...and he ponies up the dough.
 
I've got to get this dude as a client. I do, I do, I do.
 
They spent $30 million on his album, not $300 million His producers were getting minimum $100,000 per track and he recorded like 85-100 songs and a few remixes.
 
300 million, 30 million either way it's very extravagant. For that price a little extra should come with it. Sounds more like like a hollywood divorce payoff than a logical albulm budget. Hey, is that figure including the price of the videos for his singles? Might push it up a little more huh?

K west? You wouldn't happen to be the "Kane West" would you?
 
30 million geesh!!!!

30 million to record his last album.Who in the hell listens to Micheal Jackson anyways? He'd be better off spending $5000 for his album and the rest fixing his face.This dude is messed up.Would you let your kids listen to him,not me.next thing you know he want's to invite them over for a slumber party.I have to admit back in the early 80's I seen him with but the tickets were free!!!!!I think Janet would have more success with a 30 million dollar record than Micheal.They won't even show close ups of his face on tv.
 
Sounds like he Invested really Badly here, Its not any better than the Pop tripe that he put out in the off the wall years. He should have saved him some money and got the white skin transplant so he could record in Muscle Shoals down south of the Mason Dixon line.

Some persons should fake thier own deaths, why did it have to be Elvis, MJ looks like a better cannidate.

Just think If Eddie hadnt of done that cameo on thriller the whole alblem would have just fizzled out, I remember that was all anyone would talk about back then.

30 million sounds like he had to pay off some more ten year old boys. that pervert belongs in a jail cell.

I for one would like Gary Glitter to stop getting all that Airplay from the NFL, That Child Molesting Asshole probubly gets a truckload of cash every NFL telecast. Like they dont know that he molests kids.
 
STOP IT

YOU CAN CALL HIM WHAT YOU WILL BUT THE BOTTOM LINE IS SOMEBODY MUST BE BUYING HIS RECORDS BECAUSE HE KEEPS SELLING AND MAKING THEM. I know all the arguments child molesting animal loving plastic surgery having bleached skin beatles stealing animal man bones owning freak. But the fact that he can borrow 30 or 300 million says something. It reminds me of the old red foxx albums that were so dirty and bad but kept selling out in stores. The bottom line is if they are bleeding him dry there may be a reason. You ever work with somebody so annoying that you wish you could charge them more just for being an ass hole. Its just like the guy who sober is agood guy but after that first drink he is an idiot. If you dont know that guy he might be you.:D
 
I guess people followed hitler by the millions so I guess that makes it right,And since he's got alot of money why not make it ok for him to molest our kids. Why hold him to the laws were expected follow, Hes got money dammit!:rolleyes:
 
Man, I posted on this topic 3 days ago and I can't believe we allow micheal jackson to live at the top of one of our forums here at bbs. Who cares about micheal jackson he sucks!!!!!!!!
Soundboy, "He can borrow 30 or 300 million says something" yeah it says he was part of the jackson 5,and that's when you could consider him somewhat normal now soundboy face it he sucks!!!!!!:D
 
OH PLEASE

He sings his production team dose most of the rest so are you saying each of them are crappy to. when you critisize him as a whole musically that is what you are doing. When i said 30 or 300 million my point was that some financial institution felt confident enough to lend him the money that they would get it back. Since we brought the subject up again about child molesting lets look at it. I am at what i call the bottom of the financial chain but if some one actually mollested my child they could not pay me enough to act like it didn't happen and not pursue their ass to the ends of the earth and bury my foot in their but so deep that my foot print would be imbeded into their skull. I cant say he did or didnt molest those kids. What I can ask is if he did why would the parents settle out of court. Was their goal money or to destroy the man who had violated their child. If we condem him we must also condem the parents as well or is it ok to not hold them to the moralistic laws we all are expected to follow because they dont have money. BULLSHIT. My post was not ment to bash or put him on a platter but bring about some facts. So here is a short review for those of you who didn't read it

1. somebody must be buying his records
2. they may overcharge him because his is dificult to work with
3. he is able to get the money he needs for whatever reason
4. No one can stop him from making records regardless of what anyone may think of him.


ONE MORE NOTE
AS LONG AS WE CAN AGREE TO DISAGREE AND STILL EXIST IN HARMONY WE ARE BETTER FOR HAVING SPOKEN
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top