Mic pres: Spend $200 or $2,000 ? ? ?

  • Thread starter Thread starter chessrock
  • Start date Start date
C

chessrock

Banned
I'm pretty much in the same boat as everyone else on this subject, and I'm guessing it's the one "glue" that probably binds the most people on the BBS: We want better preamps to plug our mics in to. Just like the rest of you, I've auditioned just about everything there is to audition in my quest to assemble the cheapskate poor-man's studio of the century. :)

From the many hours/days worth of research, auditioning, and asking around, I've come to one conclusion: There are some good-sounding preamps available in the very affordable price range of around $200. And there are some GREAT sounding preamps out there in the $2,000 range. And little exists in between. Nothing out there in most of our budget ranges can beat the M-audio DMP-3 for the price. And the preamps on alot of our Mackie mixers? Very usable.

Unfortunately, some of us fall more in to an in-between category where $500 to $1000 certainly isn't out of our range. We just want to know that the difference between that and our Mackies will be justified.

Unfortunately, the common wisdom still seems to be spend $200 or spend $2,000. The reason is that there really hasn't been anything in the in-between range that was noticeably better for the money. Certainly a lot of manufacturers have tried and failed. Still, nothing that sells for $600 appears to be a big enough step up from the Mackie XDRs to justify the cost. Now the DMP3 makes things even more interesting. At $200, it flat-out matches or beats anything in the "in-between" range.

But what about this little Burr-brown outfitted wonder known as the Grace Design, you ask? Although you'll get a better sound for sure, the gap between that and your Mackie mixer is not going to leave you breathless. How much better is it, really? I mean those Mackies are still sounding pretty good. If you need evidence, have a listen to the accoustic guitar recordings in the Mic forum comparing the C1 to an NTK. The preamp: Mackie XDR. Damn. Sounds nice, doesn't it?

The Grace is a curious sort, to say the least. From the info. I have gathered from other audio engineer-types within the industry, the GD still isn't the holy grail of $600 pres. It is, however, supposedly a noticeable step in the right direction. I've never spoken with a gear snob who put his nose in the air at one, so that's a very good sign.

Never heard one bubbling with joy over them, either, and that concerns me. Furthermore, the camps seem to be divided on whether a chip-based design is capable of delivering the goods one would get from a discreet unit. Hell, my VC6Q and DMP2 have decent chips.

Alot of you are probably thinking "What about the Joemeek VC1Q, or the Peavey VMP2?," etc. And it's a good thing if you were thinking that. My only problem is that what we like about both of these models is the color they provide. If I buy the Joemeek, the preamp will certainly be good, but it's really the color of the compressor and EQ that my ears are liking. The preamp alone is just, well, a good preamp. Same idea with the Peaveys: I think we like it's thick, tube flavor. I REALLY like it's thick tube flavor, by the way. :) Great for a lot of applications and music styles, but not necessarily for everything. That's my only beef.

A popular option is to just enjoy your Mackies and/or DMP3's untill you can afford something noticeably better, like a Great River, an Averill-racked Nevie Campbell :) , or anything that Mercenary Audio might have on it's delicious yet upscale menu.

While the jury may still be out on some of the others, I still have yet to speak with a single person in the know who doesn't rave about the Great River. Harvey Gerst pointed this out to us a few months ago, and most of the second opinions I'm getting seem to confirm his thoughts (as seems to be the case on most of the things that guy says). Unfortunately, at $1,750.00, that one tends lean more towards the $2,000 side of the scale for a lot of our tastes.

So is there hope for the "in-between" range of, say, $600-700? The only likely scenarios I can possibly see go like this:

* Sytek wisens up and releases a two-channel, or even a one-channel box. Granted, it wouldn't fall in to the magical $600 range, wouldn't be discreet, but who cares? !! $400 for two channels worth of Sytek would just plain kick ass. :)

* Jim Williams at Audio Upgrades partners with another manufacturer to release a cheaper "package" for his preamp boards (Hey, maybe he should get on the phone with the guys as 797 :) ).

* The RNMP comes out sometime within the next century and lives up to it's hype.

* Great River comes out with a simplified, single-channel "MP-1."

The Great River idea is the one I am crossing my fingers for. Were it to happen, hypothetically, we would be looking at the Homerecer's Holy Grail. A legitimate, no-brainer step up at that magical price range of $600-$700 that has illuded us all and confounded so many manufacturers who have tried and failed with their lame attempts. (See Focusrite Green & Platinum, DBX Silver, others).

Judging from the amount of people I personally know, as well as the amount of posts I see here on this subject, this is something that could mean a lot of moo-la for our friends at Great River. I just wonder if they would be prepared to handle the kind of demand this would place on their company. Up untill now, they've probably enjoyed a very robust yet manageable level of business. The MP1 would thrust them very much in to the mainstream, with thousands of homewreckers and project studioists emerging from their basements in to the sunlight, buying them up by the truck loads.

My gut feeling is that Great River is probably happy with their current market niche. Neither Sytek nor Audio Upgrades appears to be ready to play with the big boys, nor does it seem like they'd want to. The RNMP holds the most promise, but Mark McQuicken is probably too much of a perfectionist to be the kind of business man this kind of demand is going to place on him. My guess here is that by the time his RNMP hits the streets, someone else will seize the opportunity and beat him to the punch . . . or worse yet, it won't possibly be able to live up to all of it's outrageous hype.

I sure hope he proves me wrong and rubs my ugly face in it good.
 
Last edited:
Jesus, don't get so damn philosophical about a box of frickin' electronics.

Just use something between the mic and the recorder (preferably it has some gain) and get over it.

Honestly... :rolleyes:



You'll thank me later.
 
Right on, chess.

After long days of reading and searching, I think this was a very honest and down-to-earth summary of the home-recording strait. On top of that, I neither have the money nor the experience to do a thorough A/B of all the equipment I need. Even if someone let me take home a broad range of preamps (Avalon, Grace, DMP3 down to Behringer), I might not be experienced enough to judge how the respective sound will sit in a 20-track recording. For all I know, I might prefer a Behringer pre during the A/B-ing .... just to find out after a week of recording that the sound sits terribly in a mix. I'm afraid that what I might think gives my voice a nice character during the A/B will sound like dung once I record more vocals on top.

There are too many people (like me) who don't really know "what exactly" a quality preamp/comp/EQ should sound like. What am I supposed to make of the many opinions I read on the internet about cheap budget-gear (Behringer, ...)? Not much I think. Good opinions are likely to come from happy users who never had the money to try out the pro-range of gear ... whilst bad opinions are likely to come from wanna-be professionals who aspire to the quality levels of a pro-studio - again, often without having the dough to actually compare the budget-product they bash with the expensive product they covet. Well and then there's the third category of people: pros ....

Problem with the latter is: I'm not sure they actually try out the more recent budget-gear. Why should they ... they've got expensive stuff that lasted for 20 years and will be good for another 20.
However, if a pro does recommend a budget product (C1, RNC, Speck ASC), I think it's time to listen. Maybe I won't hear the quality myself immediately when I first try it but after a time of using and recording, I might eventually hear the benefits I get from such a quality unit. Bottomline for me is: if I want to make decent recordings with decent gear, the most reliable point of reference are recommendations by the professionals.

As Chess pointed out, correctly as I think, there is no broadly recommended preamp in the $500-1000 range that would significantly heighten the quality of below-$500 preamps (or channel strips IMIO). In other words, there is no RNC or C1 equivalent product in the preamp-domain. So why spend more than $200-300 on a preamp? I guess I'll just have to wait and save up $1500+ or hope and pray for good pro-reviews on the RNMP or the SP VTB-1 ...

There's another thing that made me think. What sets me apart from professional engineers in the first place is not the gear - it's my skill. I mean, I have good ears, I play several instruments more than well, I compose and have a feeling for arrangements, .... BUT my recording skills are more than underdeveloped in comparison. I only have a rudimentary understanding of: frequency carving, compressor settings, signal path optimization, ... moreover, my homestudio is less than perfect accoustically and I'm not a pro at micing either. That's a number of deficiencies that certainly outweigh the quality gain I would derive from a $500-1000 piece of gear in comparison with something below the $500 line.

My conclusion, I will save for more expensive gear and until then, use whatever is sensible given my natural limitations (skill and room accoustics).
 
The biggest challenge for newbies (I'm a newbie when it comes to studio mics and pres) is that it's a lot easier to identify crappy gear than it is to identify quality (transparent) gear. Sometimes what grabs you at first about a cheap pre or comp is what gets really old down the road.

I could see myself showing a new mic pre to one of my friends "Do you hear that?" "Hear what?" "Nothing, get it? It's so freakin quiet and clean" "Oh, 2 grand for that? It doesnt even have effects!"
 
all I'd like to add is that this place is great for getting things off are chests; I mean without this board we'd all be walkin' around are rooms in circles fuming about this kind of shit to areselves (we'll at least we stop to type don't we).

Bottom line; most here are home recordists and play instruments. If you have the songs, get them recorded to a decent standard and get on with playing. I mean the amount of time we all spend looking and researching equipment we could all have written some hit songs, made a fortune and bought top of the range neve...................................
 
It's good all this talkin' out loud isn't it.

Oh btw I'd add the Envoice in with the mid price ones just to make things a little more complicated.

One other thing worth debating is the digital domain; one feature for example the DBX 386 in this range has which is a nice option, on others like the envoice I belive you can have this as an added feature.
 
I have to say, it's hard to justify spending cash on things like convertor and preamps; the things that go in between a microphone and a recording device, especially being a guitarist. If it wasn't for my multi-talent's (lol (recording gear, bass guitars, drums, outboard gear etc) I'd have the most beautiful guitar rig imagineable (well almost).
 
Krystof01,
I think digital converters coming with a channel-strip, compressor or pre-amp are completely ill-conceived solutions to a virtually non-existent problem in today's market. If you want to record to digital then you'll get a decent audiocard anyway ... and rather than using the AD that comes with my channelstrip, I'd prefer they lowered the price by $150 (or more) so I could get a Midiman Audiophile.

I'm not sure I get your point when you say "... add the Envoice in with the mid price ones just to make things a little more complicated."
 
Interesting thread. Brings to mind a conversation I was having a couple of weeks ago with a guy who runs his own studio. He's a real pro, his studio is really nice -- his mic locker is just ridiculous, he's got a Stephen Paul-modded Neumann, a vintage C12, and that's just the beginning. The guy charges $50/hr for his services and certainly has the equipment & quality of room to justify it (he also has an RNC, btw, and raves about it).

I was talking to him about gear that I'm thinking of getting down the road, and told him that pre-amps are high on my list; either I'm going to save as best I can for a Great River, or I'll wait and see what the RNMP is like, if it ever even comes out. The guy told me "Pre-amps are the most over-hyped thing on the pro audio market. Everybody's always talking about them because they're such a 'sexy' piece of gear to have in your rack, but they aren't nearly as important as microphones." He went on to recommend that I direct more of my resources towards monitors ("They're your connection to reality," he said, "Just like tires on your car: They're what connect you to the ground, all the finely tuned braking systems in the world won't do anything for your car if your tires are bald. Likewise all the great gear in the world won't do anything for your recordings if you don't have the means to listen accurately to what you're doing."). He sang the praises of Mackie XDR pres and said they're hard to beat for the $.

Take that for what it's worth -- the guy had a UA 2-610 in his rack, along with a couple of Telefunkens and a Meek, so it's not like he doesn't see some value in mic pre's. Anyway his point of view isn't expressed very often and it certainly gave me something to think about.
 
pres

you do not need to spend $2k on a mic pre. I have nothign bt quality pres in my studio and have only spent that much on 1 pre.

You do get what you pay for however.

Around $1k for a stereo pair seems the be the price point for things. The new UA 2108 is an awesome piece of gear and is about $1200. thats 600 per channel, and a damn good deal.

Sytek pre's, while cleaner than the UA can be had for about $800 a pair.

I think if you spend much less than that on a stereo unit, you are better off with whatever crappy pres you already have, you'll just be buying another crappy pre in a different box.

I have magnecord tube pre which Ive been thinking about selling, its about $300 and built in the 50's, so top notch tube gear, not like the hybrid crap out today.

dave
 
ahhhhh ... I liked what Herman had to say :) ... that felt so nice on my preamp-chasing soul. I wanna believe it's true.

The problem faced by "homies" is that there is not just one part in the signal chain that could be upgraded ($$$). Hence, getting a bigshot preamp will enhance the recording quality only marginally with the other budget pieces in the chain (Mic, EQ, comp, limiter, AD converter) unchanged. Still, one has to start the upgrading process at some end and the pre seems a wise choice.

I want to keep in mind that taking the step from a $200 pre to a $1500 pre makes sense only if in the nearer future on intends to take a similar measure for the other $200 gear in the chain. Anyone a different opinion on that?
 
mcr; just adding the MindPrint Envoice to the initial list of chessrock's $600 range; thats all.
 
Just want to underscore a point made by MCR.

Engineers who have been doing this for the last 20 years generally have good classic pres that are better than just about anything in the sub $1k range. They dont bother to check new gear in that range bec they dont need to and bec most of it is crap. However, what was true 5 years ago is not true now and there are pres that are very solid in the $500 range AND a sig step up from mackie. The DMP3 is not a huge step up from mackie but is airier and more open sounding and will make a bit of a dif in overall sound after youve layered 5 vocal tracks, 12 guitars and drum overheads through them. You will hear a dif. Its not nite and day though. (Same goes for soundcraft, although WITH soundcraft EQ youll hear a huge dif.) However, when youve recorded a song with an envoice (just the pre without EQ or compression) and compare that to the DMP3 or mackie there is a very noticable dif in presence, space, overall bigness and depth. Transients are tighter and brighter as well. Plugging a mic into a preamp is not the same as plugging a guitar into a stack. The immediate gratification of listening to this huge sound wash over you just doesnt happen... At least not until youve trained your ears. You get to know a preamp over time by using it on dif voices, dif instruments and with dif mics AND by seeing how it sounds after everything is tracked before youve EQd or compressed or effected anything much. How many engineers with great river, buzz, or cranesong in their racks bothered to track a song through mindprint, grace or focusrite which are decent ($500 range)?

BTW compare focusrite's voicemaster which has a class A pre (as does the tonefactory, the penta and the trakmaster) with the DMP3 which has a chip and see how much water the chip vs discrete thing really holds. I prefer the DMP3.
 
Dolemite said:
Jesus, don't get so damn philosophical about a box of frickin' electronics.

Just use something between the mic and the recorder (preferably it has some gain) and get over it.

Honestly... :rolleyes:



You'll thank me later.

Thank you. :) That's some funny stuff. And you do bring up a good point. But to me, this stuff is all very fun. I am a marketing person by trade, so I revel in watching these manufacturers, and how they go about launching and marketing their products.

And it also interests me a great deal to see how we react to their products, how they perform in the marketplace, and how technology advances effect their quality. For some very strange reason, this stuff really fascinates me. :) I should probably seek therapy.
 
what about...

the Drawmer MX60?

i'm always curious about companies that have the high-end lines, and then their cheaper lines; i mean, they obviously know how to make good stuff, but do they apply that to their less expensive items?

has anyone used this pre?

thanks!
mac
 
FWIW, Fletcher at Mercenary recommends the Earthworks Lab pre's. He sells the one channel 101 for $675, and the two channel 102 for $1350.
 
chessrock:

That was an awesome rant. Exactly one of the things that's always been in the back of my mind. I have a Mackie XDR and often muse about having a sexy dedicated pre sitting in my rack.

Herman:

Then along you come and help me rationalize not setting aside $$ in a quest for a better pre. THANK YOU. (Even if there is a significantly better pre in the mentioned price range, I'd rather be blissfully ignorant... right now ;) ).

A better upgrade for me would be adding a TLM103 to my mic aresenal for the same price as a pre upgrade.
 
A better upgrade for me would be adding a TLM103 to my mic aresenal for the same price as a pre upgrade.

Yeah. The merits of adding high-end mic pre's is a subject open to debate, but I would definitely say get your mic collection up to speed before splurging on anything else in the signal path.
 
guys (and girls??), here's something that might be interesting for you. I emailed with Alan Hyatt frmo Studioprojects who sells the much talked about budget condensor mics (C1, C3). He has sent me a CD where they try to give an impression of the difference between the C1, C3 and T3. Cool for us, they recorded the same song (once the entire song, once vocal only) using each of the three mics on each of the 5 different preamps: focusrite Red1, Neve 1089, modified V72, Trident A Range and JoeMeek VC1Q.
There are two songs (R&B and Rock), each not quite a minute long. Both songs were done on each mic on each preamp. The cuts are done both with music, and soloed. The last cut, number 61 has many parts as background harmonies. So, that is 60 clips a la 60secs each (3 mics x 5 preamps x 2 songs - each soloed or as complete mix ). I'm not sure I'm being to clear on this so read it up yourself: http://www.studioprojectsusa.com/PDF's/SP_Sessions.pdf

Even though this is supposed to give an impression of the mics, it was more of a pre-shootout for me ... I think Alan still sends them out for free. So contact him and get an impression of some high-class pre-amps and one homerec-preamp (JoeMeek).
 
Back
Top