Markd102 said:
Yeah, the DMP3 will sound just fine on some tracks, but the point is.... a B3 through his Behringer will sound way better than a SM58 through a DMP.
It's a no brainer. He simply needs a better mic before a better preamp.
That is not necessarily true. Have you used the DMP3? I have chosen an SM57 over a $1,000 tube mic (through the DMP3) on some of my vocal tracks.
First of all, the DMP3 is only $150--hardly a great financial setback on the evential road to better and more expensive gear.
I happen to own both the DMP3 and
the MX802 he is now using. The difference is significant IMO. The Behringer is brittle and harsh (which is even more pronounced with bright condensers). Also, recordings produced with the Beh have very poor stereo imaging. The DMP3, on the other hand, produces recordings that are warm yet clear in comparison and with much more depth and dimnension in the stereo field.
Second, he already has two nice SDs for recording acoustic strings and woodwinds. They will sound very, very good through the DMP3.
Did I mention the DMP3 is only $150? I believe that leaves enough in his budget for a B1 if he wants one, but he may find his Shure KSM
109s sounds just as good (or better) as a B1 on vocals. My MC012 sounds pretty damn good on vox through the DMP3.
So, he sells the Beh for $50 and buys the DMP3 for $150.
He uses the much better preamp for a year or two until he can afford his Vintech (or whatever).
Then he sells the DMP3 for $100 (and ends up getting to use it instead of the crappy Beh for a year for only $50 net cost).
That's what I call a no brainer.