ddr (266) ram in theory runs twice as fast as standard joe lunchbox and sally housecoat sdram. in actuality the performance gain lies usually between 5-20 percent over joe sixpack sdram. 512 megs of ddr would be preferable to 1024 of sdram. your p4 will be choked by holly homemaker sdram. it is advisable to get enough ram so as to be able to turn the swapfile off. you might want a little more than 512 if you are running xp. plus nt os's actually address large amounts of ram much better than the 9x operating systems. don' t be a johnny punch-clock, get more ram. as far as i know chipsets that support intel chips can only recognize up to ddr400. i think the newest amd boards support dual in-line ddr ram. i haven't researched this stuff in about a month so things might have recently changed. dual in-line ddr-ram is lame cause you get a very small speed increase and have to buy twice as much ram. we are probably not going to see anything faster than ddr400 though so looks like we'll be forced to go this route. although it should get faster as soon as they realize no one is going for it. a 533 mhz front side bus is mute at this point as far as memory is concerned because there is no memory in this whole wide big blue marble that takes advantage of this.