Maxell 1/2" tapes .. They do exist!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter cjacek
  • Start date Start date
cjacek

cjacek

Analogue Enthusiast

Attachments

  • tn_maxell1.webp
    tn_maxell1.webp
    29.7 KB · Views: 94
  • tn_maxell2.webp
    tn_maxell2.webp
    30.5 KB · Views: 99
Wow. I can't even imagine what people want for Maxell 1/2" tape on ebay. Considering I've seen regular UD 35-180 going for upwards of $70 for a single reel, 1/2" must be about $500 at that rate!:eek:

Just kidding, I have no idea what it would go for.;)
 
I personally feel it may not even sell at all and if it does, may not go for much. This as the result of the tape not being well known and info being virtually non-existant. It will be a sleeper deal IMHO, tho I may be wrong. At the same time, I'd be hesitant buying an opened product.:eek:
 
Beck said:
Yup, it ws arjoll that said they had it in NZ. We never had it in 1/2" where I live. That's one tape I never used.
Click to expand...

Maxell made 1/2" tape and it was available in the early 80s. They stopped at "consumer" machines and never made it to wide gap formats.
 
MCI2424 said:
Maxell made 1/2" tape and it was available in the early 80s. They stopped at "consumer" machines and never made it to wide gap formats.
Click to expand...

Wide gap formats? :eek: :D Keep trying (well, no please don't keep trying). :rolleyes:
 
Faux pas

Beck said:
Wide gap formats? :eek: :D Keep trying (well, no please don't keep trying). :rolleyes:
Click to expand...


OK Beck, You beat me to it. I was going to let it slide after all.

MCI, looks like you showed your ignorance here or you mis-typed significantly....
 
evm1024 said:
OK Beck, You beat me to it. I was going to let it slide after all.

MCI, looks like you showed your ignorance here or you mis-typed significantly....
Click to expand...


:D :D And he said it again, so I think that cinches it. ;)
 
MCI2424 said:
Read up on "wide gap formats" and get back to me.
Click to expand...

No please, just talk a bit more... elaborate for us on the gap issue and how you see it relating to tape formulations, or any other recording topic if you like. I think the members here can learn something from what you have to say... and how you say it. :D

Don’t mind me… be a sport… forget me for a moment and think of the other members. What you can tell them about gap in reference to tape formulations probably can’t be found on the web. Why keep these golden nuggets from the brethren here? :confused:

Anyone can, "Go read up on it." But then we wouldn't need a forum.
 
I'm back. I mean, - forward :)

MCI2424 said:
Read up on "wide gap formats" and get back to me.
Click to expand...
here Ya' go:
:D
 

Attachments

  • wide_gap.webp
    wide_gap.webp
    26.2 KB · Views: 88
MCI2424 said:
Maxell made 1/2" tape and it was available in the early 80s. They stopped at "consumer" machines and never made it to wide gap formats.
Click to expand...



Wide gap formats. Open wide, man.
 

Attachments

  • badhead004.webp
    badhead004.webp
    30.3 KB · Views: 47
  • head_drawing1.webp
    head_drawing1.webp
    9.9 KB · Views: 49
For those that are as stupid as it gets, "Narrow gap" format machines stop at 1" width tape format. 1/2" is the norm like the TASCAMS and FOSTEX machines. Wide gap (lack of a better term) pro machines go to 2"

Pro machines fit 16-24tracks on 2" tape. Narrow gap (format) machines fit 16-24 tracks on 1/2" -1" tape.

The japanese refer to these heads as "narrow gap" meaning the width of the track. Eddie Cileti more correctly refers to these heads as "narrow format"

Whichever, I assumed people here knew the difference between these two formats but I guess I was wrong.


Maxell was a company geared towards consumer (non-pro) machines like cassettes and 1/4", 1/2" reel machine tape. They did not cater to pro level equipment.


http://industryclick.com/magazinear...easeid=5825&magazinearticleid=72583&SiteID=15

This article makes a reference to "narrow" format heads vs. "wide" format (gap) heads.
 
Last edited:
The word "gap" is nowhere to be found in the attached document.

What the crap are you talking about, man? Please, I'd like to know.

Educate us.
 
Muckelroy said:
The word "gap" is nowhere to be found in the attached document.

What the crap are you talking about, man? Please, I'd like to know.

Educate us.
Click to expand...


Please re-read my post above. I have no time to re-type.
 
There's a strong difference between head gap and track width.

You just got them a little mixed up. I forgive you;)
 
Muckelroy said:
The word "gap" is nowhere to be found in the attached document.

What the crap are you talking about, man? Please, I'd like to know.

Educate us.
Click to expand...


Oh, BTW the first line definately applies to you because, after the first line. I explained that the document refers to "narrow format" and it is a more correct definition. The japanese refer to "narrow gap" head (NOT THE F'n track GAP) as track width. IE: Japenese call it narrow gap meaning the track width (like the english used to refer to cigarettes as fags).

To us, it is "narrow format"

Now you have been educated.
 
It's time to narrow the gap between us and Japenese.
I'm am for narrowing gaps. What'cha think?
:D
***********
Hey, MCI, you could be Bill's advisor, so insted of redefining "IS", he could simply point his finger toward The Emperor of The Sun and get over with it. :)
Keep your skills sharp, because in the close future The Union may need your help any day.
here's William:
 

Attachments

  • Bill.webp
    Bill.webp
    22.7 KB · Views: 38
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top