I second that! I don't really rely on it for much more than normalizing for dsp, and it does a hell of a job with that. I can't believe the quality my cd's are getting with the ML. Everything that I've used previously; cheaper burners, the computer- pales in comparison. The hd recordings are a perfect replication of what's inputted. For instance- I use an Akai dps24 to track (this time at 24/16), and then record the mix into the ML. I took Blue Bears advice and went in through the anologe inputs so the ML can show off what I invested in- it's great converters. It sounds unreal, awesome! The red book cd's are nothing short of spectacular. I will try some of the other dsp functions, but I tend to do dsp on the dps24, before it ever hits the ML. Also, I honestly just screw with it not knowing too much about what I'm doing, so lately I've taken to try out dsp and if it sounds BETTER, than I keep it. More often than not, I'm actually making matters worse, so I leave well enough alone. I have found that by resisting eq and dsp temptation, I'm getting better results. Far better to record great sounding tracks to begin with.
So, I'm one of those guys who don't really have a handle yet on how powerful dsp can be if used right, but I still get tremendous benefits from the ML. Outside of my Akai dps24, it's the best thing I could have ever gotten to give my mixes the best shot they can get. I HIGHLY recommend it, even to those who just need a pro level burner and know nothing about it's dsp functions.
Check out my latest song done with
the Akai dps24, mastered over to the ML. The best results I've gotten so far!
http://www.songramp.com/view.ez?sampleid=1953
Dan