Ninja_Drummer
New member
Though I know the heated debate that entails, I'd just like to hear a few opinions as to how, to me, it seems like digitally produced (electronica music) mixes can be pushed a little more than analog (rock, etc.) produced music.
An example would be mixing say a trance or D n' B mix versus say like a heavy metal or hard rock mix. From what I can assume and understand, analog mixes have much more busy signals than digital in terms of wave consistency, case in point, the mix is easier to "compress" and "drive" rather than a digital mix. Kinda like if you were trying to level a range of mountain peaks versus leveling a tall building. I also think it may have to do with conversion factors of analog to digital or analog to tape, which I really don't have the knowledge of breaking down the science of method of how that works, but I'm sure you catch my drift.
So anyone wanna bust this mystery for me?
An example would be mixing say a trance or D n' B mix versus say like a heavy metal or hard rock mix. From what I can assume and understand, analog mixes have much more busy signals than digital in terms of wave consistency, case in point, the mix is easier to "compress" and "drive" rather than a digital mix. Kinda like if you were trying to level a range of mountain peaks versus leveling a tall building. I also think it may have to do with conversion factors of analog to digital or analog to tape, which I really don't have the knowledge of breaking down the science of method of how that works, but I'm sure you catch my drift.
So anyone wanna bust this mystery for me?