TelePaul said:
Hey man I worked a crappy job for this...Although i suppose it may bother someone that my first aocustic is a Martin and im still a teenager.
Not at all, bro!! Good choice and way to spend that hard earned money WELL.
My first guitar- the one I learned on- was a crappy Les Paul studio copy that wouldn't stay in tune for more than 10 minutes and sounded like crap. Good enough to learn on, though, and only cost around $200. The amp I bought was a cheap but good work horse: Peavey
Classic Chorus 212, 75 watts per channel, true stereo chorus, etc. - $400.
My second guitar was
a Gibson Les Paul Custom, white, with a Kahler trem. I still have it (though it has faded to cream instead of white) and it is still my main guitar. I love it and I could never have afforded it if I waited until I was out on my own, paying bills, and whatnot. $1100 new, blemished (paint damaged where the headstock sat on the stand at the store), and to this day it remains the best $1100 I've ever spent. Even though I worked at a fast food joint for a year to save up that much.
I still have the Peavey, too. The distortion channel is pretty crappy, but the clean channel is very useable- and fed by
a Fulltone OCD or SansAmp it does the job just *fine* for distorted tones. Not a bad $400 spent almost 18 years ago. I just rented it to a Hawaiian band I know, as well, for their west coast tour. Took it like the work horse that it is and the very discerning lead guitarist was quite happy with it.
My point is you get what you pay for. That Martin will last you forever if you take good care of it and it will improve with age, too. Excellent choice for spending the moeny earned at a crappy job. It'll still be worth it 20 years from now, long after the crappy job is a faded memory.
Take care,
Chris