G
Greg_L
Banned
Yeah side 2 can go either way. Those songs are for the true fans.
Ooooh yeah, my dad had a bunch of Marantz stuff. Good shit. He had a quadrophonic setup when I was a kid and he'd sit me in the middle of the room and I'd listen to that shit swirl around.
And conveniently compact.
Yeah, I agree with both of you. I wouldn't actually go get a turntable and start a record collection. I'm just as happy finding a song that pops into my head out of the blue on Youtube (like this one). But saving up, buying, un-rapping, and listening while reading and checking out the cover art and the inside stuff was an experience in itself.
I think that touches on where the recording labels (read releasing labels) completely lost the market. The packaging of the music was an integral part of the buyer's experience (cover art, liner notes, etc.). Yes it is slightly more expensive, but it would attract and boost sales.
Not anymore. Kids don't give one single fuck about looking at cover art or reading liner notes. They don't care about the concept of an album. They don't care how the songs flow from one to the next. They don't care about the hidden gems on side two. Today's music is all about the single, and having your MP3 player on shuffle.
You are right, the packaging was important. I don't know how many times I went into a record store to browse the racks and end up buying an album solely based on the cover art. Most of the time I discovered some truly remarkable music.I think that touches on where the recording labels (read releasing labels) completely lost the market. The packaging of the music was an integral part of the buyer's experience (cover art, liner notes, etc.). Yes it is slightly more expensive, but it would attract and boost sales.
Lol. This is it. Like 1996 or something?
![]()
Not anymore. Kids don't give one single fuck about looking at cover art or reading liner notes. They don't care about the concept of an album. They don't care how the songs flow from one to the next. They don't care about the hidden gems on side two. Today's music is all about the single, and having your MP3 player on shuffle.
Back in '84, a year before I actually bought my first video, I was looking to buy a betamax video. My mate's brother was a bit of a coke dealer and philanderer and he had one. I never thought about the quality until the late 90s/early noughties when I would do deliveries to post production studios. Sometimes, the guys would be at work and I'd peek in and I was amazed by the clarity of betamax. Perhaps I'm exaggerating, but it looked much better than HD and stands up to blue ray.Its a bit like betamax videos
The Rollers !I hate to admit this but i was a rollers fan too. My old man and my wife just love to take the piss about this.
Dad always shouts "we love the rollers" because of a news clip back in the day when girls mobbed them.
They love to remind me i had a tartan scarf i used to wear round my waste and those oxford bags.
I say keep it in perspective dad i was 12 years old.
It kind of depends. For the most part, 11 minute solos of any kind are wrist slitters.Who wants a 11 minute guitar solo.
Three albums that spring to mind are "Outlandos d'amour" and "Ghost in the machine" by the Police and "Hunky Dory" by David Bowie. I was looking for "So Lonely" and "Every little thing she does is magic" by the Police and "Life on Mars" by Bowie. In the second hand record shops, the albums were only £2, which, by '84, was cheaper than the cost of a single so I bought the albums. When I got round to checking out the songs, I thought I'd give the albums a whirl just to see if there might be "one or two others" that I might like. Dang and durn, Billybob ! All three were jam packed with brilliance, songs as good as if not better than what I'd originally been looking for. I still love them now.One thing I always liked about albums were the hidden gems. I almost always found songs on the albums that I liked better than the singles/hits that came from the albums.
You know, at the risk of incurring our collective ire, even in the days of great album covers, I think it was actually a minority of record buyers that poured over the covers like us. Very few of the people I knew were particularly interested in album covers.I think that touches on where the recording labels (read releasing labels) completely lost the market. The packaging of the music was an integral part of the buyer's experience (cover art, liner notes, etc.). Yes it is slightly more expensive, but it would attract and boost sales.
I'm not so sure the majority of "kids" of yesteryear are really that different.Not anymore. Kids don't give one single fuck about looking at cover art or reading liner notes. They don't care about the concept of an album. They don't care how the songs flow from one to the next. They don't care about the hidden gems on side two. Today's music is all about the single, and having your MP3 player on shuffle.
In a way, things have simply come full circle. Although we lament the passing of the album, Up until 1968, it was primarilly a singles dominated industry. Relatively few artists made consistently good albums prior to then. Often you'd get a couple of singles or killer songs and 10 or 12 fillers including an effort by some group members, that weren't taken too seriously but which fans unexpectedly grew to love.How the whole industry is now about the single, but "back in the day" they saw the entire album as a single piece of work: the flow of the songs, the contrast and variety of the songs, the mood that the combined songs created, side one vs. side two, and of course, the artwork and the liner notes.
My whole musical headspace changed because of album covers. At 16, I dug the Beatles, Stones, Jackson 5, the Monkees, soul, pop and bits of classical. I was at a friend's house and he shared a room with his older brother and I was going through his record collection {I'd already borrowed a Stones cassette because I dug the cover ~ "Through the past, darkly"} and I came across this EMI repackaging of the first two Pink Floyd albums called "A nice pair". I thought the cover was the most incredible I'd seen, all four sides and the inner sleeves. I just had to listen to the music ! And I did. And it blew me away so far that I never truly came back ! But it took me down a road that I was ever keen to keep exploring. Which led down other roads.You are right, the packaging was important. I don't know how many times I went into a record store to browse the racks and end up buying an album solely based on the cover art. Most of the time I discovered some truly remarkable music.
I'm not so sure the majority of "kids" of yesteryear are really that different.
.