You are a perfectionist or you are not. If you were you wouldn't put out something imperfect.
You may be obsessive, reaching for the stars, trying to do better or all of them but perfectionists don't exist - perfectionism is a disability that rendered the sufferer imperfect hence they can no longer be perfectionists - & might I add they usually have messy bedrooms!
I respectfully disagree, Ray. Perfectionism does not necessarily lead one to become incapacitated by his condition to the point of closing down in totality.
One can be a perfectionist, yet rationalize that perfection is often an unachievable, illogical goal.
I consider myself a
recovering perfectionist.
Long ago, I realized that perfection, although very desirable, is mostly unattainable. That was a bitter pill to swallow; and I'm not referring to my limited musical abilities here.
In essence, I rationalized that I am a perfectionist, but perfectionists cannot function adequately in the universe as it exists due to the chaos theory. I can only control so much before reaching the point of diminishing returns. Logically, additional effort will not change most outcomes. Ergo, I do the best I can, within reason, and try to cope with any undesirable outcomes that follow.
Further, perfectionism is a very grueling, tiring mindset that is futile. Sheer exhaustion usually results from the effort.
Ultimately, I reasoned that I have two options; (a) do the best that I can, which is often less than perfect, or (b) do nothing, which is even less desirable. Many times, I would rather do nothing than engage in a behavior that will produce an imperfect result, but I understand the flaw in that reasoning and I resist the strong urge to remain passive rather than engage in imperfect behavior.
The circular logic that confounds me to this day is:
1. "Do not spend too much time on the mundane details of a project at the expense of completing the entire project on time" (i.e., rapidity is better than accuracy).
2. "Ensure that the mundane specifics and details of the project are fully addressed and the project is error-free" (i.e., accuracy is better than rapidity).
D'oh!
It annoys me to no end when someone else catches a mistake that I made when I knew
beforehand that, had I been given more time on the project, I would have easily caught the mistake myself.
I consider myself a fast, efficient person, and such circular logic is mind-boggling to me. Remember, such "logic" is how NASA managed to lose a multi-million dollar spacecraft (e.g., the engineers mixed metric and English units of measure by mistake because no one took the time to do it correctly and check the details of processes and results). Rapidity was emphasized over accuracy in the case, and the results were quite predictable, as usual.
What were we talking about again? Heh.
Rant over...
Cheers,
Joseph