djclueveli
New member
is it true that the less instruments you have in a mix the bigger each instrument has to be? and what exactly does this mean and how is it done?
is it true that the less instruments you have in a mix the bigger each instrument has to be? and what exactly does this mean and how is it done?
Yes, no, it's kinda true.is it true that the less instruments you have in a mix the bigger each instrument has to be? and what exactly does this mean and how is it done?
Yes, no, it's kinda true.
Some times simplicity is the best way to go. Othertimes it isn't.
"Carving" can also be achieved by the proper selection of mics and mic placement. Maybe "assigning frequency ranges" would have been a better phrase.You shouldn't have to "carve" very much, unless something was recorded improperly, the tone is way off, etc. I now officially hate the very concept of "carving," unless it's a thanksgiving turkey.
"Carving" can also be achieved by the proper selection of mics and mic placement. Maybe "assigning frequency ranges" would have been a better phrase.
As we're carving out a definition of "carving out" or "assigning", I'd like to take it even a step further and say that it goes as far back - or at least it should - as the arrangement of the song itself.chessrock said:That's a good way to put it.
So much more of it still depends on the instruments and the technique. It's kind of tough to "assign" a frequency range ... I mean it is what it is, and it's at where it's at for the most part.
I'd say yes and no to that. The less busy a mix, the more important it becomes to get the sound of each instrument sounding good.legionserial said:Yeah if you have fewer instruments, everything has more room to breath, and you don't need to mess with things as much. Denser mixes need more work.
I'd say yes and no to that. The less busy a mix, the more important it becomes to get the sound of each instrument sounding good.
Simpler mixes usually sound better by their very nature, IMHO. Less is often more. I find them more fun to work with also, but usually because they just plain sound better.Very true, but another way to put it would be that you get to spend more time concentrating on getting each instrument to sound good, rather than spending so much time messing around trying to get things to fit. I much prefer working with sparse mixes for that reason. There may be certain naunces to an instrument that you get the freedom to highlight in the mix moreso than if you have a whole bunch of stuff going on. Sometimes I feel that sacrifices have to be made while mixing something with a lot going on. But then that's probably because I'm far from an accomplished mixer.
I say this because I spend a most of my time working on metal, and when I work on something that isn't quite so balls to the wall and full of sound, that freedom can be quite a joy.