
0018G said:Are they repairable? Yes. Will it affect the sound? Shouldn't. The two at the bottom are stricly a cosmetic issue, IMO, but the sooner you fix any crack the better chance you have of a good glue bond and less cosmetic issues due to contamination. The top two are probably cosmetic as well, but their proximity to the neck block would make me a little nervous-you definately need to get those looked at. Better safe than sorry.
I think some Gibsons from the 70's had a laminated back and sides. Do these cracks go all the way through, or are they only in an outer lamination?
0018G said:Do these cracks go all the way through, or are they only in an outer lamination?
Factor in at least £100 per crack for the cost of the repair. I'll let Light quote you an idea in $'s but I think he'd be in the same ball park as a minimum. A very rough guess on that is at least 2 days work for a proper fix. Anything else is part dodge or not appropriate for the instruments value plus you would have someone under experienced working on it. One of the most common things us guys see is badly repaired cracks and splits. I don't think there is an area of repair that you get to see so many botched jobs, possibly neck resets but they are less common. Get it done right if you do get the instrument. Hope it works out for you.timboZ said:Yes they go all the way through.
I do not own this guitar yet. But I was thinking of making an offer to the owner.
We have already established that the cracks go right through the back. In which case it is not a laminated back.Milnoque said:Although Gibson did make some instriments with laminated back and sides I don't believe that guitar is one of them.
The ones in the upper bout look to me to be wide of the neck block, But they may be close enough to make good cleating a pain.
Clean examples of that vintage Gibson are not highly sought after and the prices are not very high. Repaired, it would be even less desirable. Make sure you check on the current market value before you make an offer.
All that having been said, Some of those guitars have a surprisingly sweet tone, although they tend to lack volume. You should be able to string it up and hear it and decide for yourself. If there are no signs of damage to the back binding at the neck joint, you wouldn't further harm the guitar.
You cannot say that with any certainty. The stability of a guitar with splits and cracks is dependant on more than the visual appearance of the binding round the heel cap. I would disregard this advice.If there are no signs of damage to the back binding at the neck joint, you wouldn't further harm the guitar.
Milnoque said:If there are no signs of damage to the back binding at the neck joint, you wouldn't further harm the guitar.
muttley600 said:One of the most common things us guys see is badly repaired cracks and splits. I don't think there is an area of repair that you get to see so many botched jobs, possibly neck resets but they are less common.
danny.guitar said:I watched a video on a Taylor site. The guy used dampets to help "heal" the crack before sending it off to repair. Looked almost perfect when he was done with it (before sending it off). Or maybe that is only for humidity/moisture-related cracks?![]()
Yep them too, glad its not just over here that people attack decent instruments with gusto and rarely the first idea of the damage they are causingBroken pegheads. The string of unbelievably bad, frequently epoxied, and rarely in register, broken pegheads is unbelievable, and unbelievably depressing.