If you can sing, but have occasional pitch problems, it is an excellent tool.Yadi said:I use Sonar and would like to hear from Sonar users who use this product. I know purists don't endorse it, but it could become a useful tool.
Sorry, have to disagree here.keerus said:the automatic mode is NOT a waste of time. if you have a very good vocal track, and you use the automatic, it will turn it into a perfect take (in terms of pitch, anyways). the graphical mode is powerful, too, but not so powerful as to make the automatic mode useless. most people use automatic as opposed to graphical anyway. make sure you keep in mind, though, that it won't turn someone who's tonedeaf into some great broadway singer.
justin
Actually you tend to work with phrases. In my experience you need to cut out a clip that has a bit of a pause both before and after. It is pretty difficult to cut out just a single note, without creating problems,tkingen said:I've never used Auto-tune, so please correct me if this is wrong...
I would guess that you would highlight only the note that needs correction, or maybe split that note into it's own clip for processing.
It sounds like you guys are using it to process an entire track?
Terry Kingen
I disagree as well.... the worst way to use autotune is throwing across a whole track.keerus said:the automatic mode is NOT a waste of time.
i use graphical mode for real vocal surgery.
I'm guessing that Antares Autotune is the industry standard because it is the best, but I don't know...tombuur said:Never tried this Antares autotune. There are other similar products I haven't tried either. Which one is the best?