solaris1982
New member
WhiteStrat...if we had an award for most avatars, you'd win hands down.
I'm still partial to Mr. Clean with the beard, though.
I'm still partial to Mr. Clean with the beard, though.
WhiteStrat...if we had an award for most avatars, you'd win hands down.
I'm still partial to Mr. Clean with the beard, though.
Hi all
Lately I haven't been playing much, and now I have to find out that I'm even less fluid than I used to be... and slower, somehow. Not much, but I am.
On the other hand I've always wanted to be able to play solos that are interesting despite the lack of lightning fast licks anyway... but I can't. Everything I play sounds extremely boring to me, predictable and too structured.
Do you have any ideas / tips on how to get away from the same old same and how to prevent myself from always trying to play at the limits of my technical abilities?
Your help is appreciated.
Cheers.
Six.
OK, this shredding thing has gone far enough. On the acoustic thing there was a time when this was considered pretty neat. What you have is a jazzer that thinks he's a rock god, a rocker who wants to be a cool jazz dude and a guy who knows his way round the frets harmonically, technically and emotionally whatever speed he decides to play at and all done on acoustics. If you cant work out which is which here's the good guy.
Sorry couldn't resist.
..... the first link was cool but the second was paco wanking...
My avatar was the topic of a recent discussion in which I disclosed that I was rotating among pictures of other shaved bald folks--since I am too. (Here's me: https://homerecording.com/bbs/showpost.php?p=2954768&postcount=13)
And before you know it, everyone started posting pics of beautiful baldness--from coneheads to Brittney Spears in her shaved phase. Needless to say, I saved them all. So don't worry--there's more coming!
Ha! Great. But the best thing about them are the kids not getting it...
One other thing ... find a shreder hand him or her and acoustical guitar ... then ask them to "shred". You will then know what they really can play.
You know, I gotta disagree. Being an excellent acoustic guitarist and being an excellent electric guitarist are two VERY different skillsets. Some players are proficcient at both, but being proficcient at one doesn't automatically make you proficcient at the other.
Consider the obverse - take a world class classical player, and hand him John Petrucci's rig with his lead tone dialed up. How good do you expect him to sound? two- or three-point fingerpicked counterpoint lines simply don't work through those sort of gain structures, and being an expert fingerpicker doesn't make you an alternate picking star, exactly. Furthermore, muting technique is a LOT less important when you're playing an intimate nylon string than when you're playing a high gain preamp cranked way up to arena volume, where even the slightest ringing of an adjacent string is going to audibly turn the phrase into mud by unpredictably beating against whatever he's trying to play. And we're not even talking about the fact here that the guitar would probably just be blowing up into feedback anyway, since that's another performance problem that most classical guys don't have. And this gets even worse if you happen to hand him one of Petrucci's seven strings.
I mean, does the classical guy "suck" because he doesn't have the technical aptitude to handle the performance problems that come with a solid body guitar and a high gain amplifier at concert volume, and because he doesn't know how to alternate pick or sweep pick? I'd say hardly. So, how exactly does a "shred" player "suck" simply becase he's not used to the comparatively uncompressed dynamics and heavier strings of a steel string acoustic?
It's a different vocabulary, with different challanges and different advantages. Some people are proficcient in both, but they're the exception, not the norm.
You know, I gotta disagree. Being an excellent acoustic guitarist and being an excellent electric guitarist are two VERY different skillsets. Some players are proficcient at both, but being proficcient at one doesn't automatically make you proficcient at the other.
Consider the obverse - take a world class classical player, and hand him John Petrucci's rig with his lead tone dialed up. How good do you expect him to sound? two- or three-point fingerpicked counterpoint lines simply don't work through those sort of gain structures, and being an expert fingerpicker doesn't make you an alternate picking star, exactly. Furthermore, muting technique is a LOT less important when you're playing an intimate nylon string than when you're playing a high gain preamp cranked way up to arena volume, where even the slightest ringing of an adjacent string is going to audibly turn the phrase into mud by unpredictably beating against whatever he's trying to play. And we're not even talking about the fact here that the guitar would probably just be blowing up into feedback anyway, since that's another performance problem that most classical guys don't have. And this gets even worse if you happen to hand him one of Petrucci's seven strings.
I mean, does the classical guy "suck" because he doesn't have the technical aptitude to handle the performance problems that come with a solid body guitar and a high gain amplifier at concert volume, and because he doesn't know how to alternate pick or sweep pick? I'd say hardly. So, how exactly does a "shred" player "suck" simply becase he's not used to the comparatively uncompressed dynamics and heavier strings of a steel string acoustic?
It's a different vocabulary, with different challanges and different advantages. Some people are proficcient in both, but they're the exception, not the norm.
You know, I gotta disagree. Being an excellent acoustic guitarist and being an excellent electric guitarist are two VERY different skillsets.
It just so happened that they played their music on guitar as opposed to... say a piano. I still maintain that most of these shreders are just playing canned licks and when that fails they revert to noise.
very true... and it's not only electric/acoustic. how many players kick ass in different genres?
The "famous" shredders play guitar as a profession, so I'm pretty damn sure they can pull of a lot more than what they show us on stage and are famous and loved for.
A lot of them can play more than they show ... but you would be surprised at how many of them are just jerking chains. I guess I'm just an old fart 'cause I really don't get some of the hype. The fact is that their are a lot of monster guitar players out there. The question is; by what yardstick you use to measure them? My age is showing.
Here are some more of your favs "wanking"
Clapton (wait til about 1.30 when the sax comes in, pure genius).
Eddie always has something musical to say.
Then there is studying at the feet of the master.
I know these might have been posted here before but as far as shredding is concerned they are all worthy of study.
hilarious mutt... thnx... though eddie is not a fav of mine personally... BTW that's steve gadd and david sanborn with clapton.... and couldnt see him real well but looked like might be jan hammer with eddie... and the only one i've ever heard on frettless 6 string till this was larry coryell... funny stuff man...