Interesting Mic controversy

  • Thread starter Thread starter slobbermonster
  • Start date Start date
As of yet, I have only seen 1 comparison of the two directly. I have read several bad reviews of the Apex, several good reviews of the Telefunken, and only 1 bad review of the Telefunken (the same person who compared the two).

I hve just learned over time to not take too much stock out of situations like this. I still have some reservations because the photos do make a convincing argument, but time and actual sonics should be the real factor here. Neither of which seem to matter to so many of the people who seem to comment on this whole scenario.

The thing that really makes me wonder is that so far everyone seems to agree that the Apex mic is "harsh" or "fizzy" yet all but one person who have actually used the Telefunken never came anywhere near that conclusion. How do we know for sure that the person who even tested both mics is telling the truth? Personally, I will wait till some of the people whom I know and trust have some actual experience with both mics. If they say that the Telefunken sounds good, then Telefunken can have my money. If they say that the Telfunken sounds good, but the Apex sounds just as good (or at least really close) than Apex may get my $1400 and I can have 6 of em:D
 
Great thread guys, some of the best reading Ive had in a while.

I think it's all about the tube. Having owned over 50 all tube guitar amps, I know first hand how huge a difference between a generic tube and a great tube can sound. Do you know that there are 12au7 tubes out there that cost $600 each? Crazy, to me too, but they have a great impact on tone. I don't know much about mics other than what I like the sound of, but I would think the tube greatly impacts the sound, and can be the differemce in tone heard between the two.

H2H
 
xstatic said:
As of yet, I have only seen 1 comparison of the two directly. I have read several bad reviews of the Apex, several good reviews of the Telefunken, and only 1 bad review of the Telefunken (the same person who compared the two).

I hve just learned over time to not take too much stock out of situations like this. I still have some reservations because the photos do make a convincing argument, but time and actual sonics should be the real factor here. Neither of which seem to matter to so many of the people who seem to comment on this whole scenario.

The thing that really makes me wonder is that so far everyone seems to agree that the Apex mic is "harsh" or "fizzy" yet all but one person who have actually used the Telefunken never came anywhere near that conclusion. How do we know for sure that the person who even tested both mics is telling the truth? Personally, I will wait till some of the people whom I know and trust have some actual experience with both mics. If they say that the Telefunken sounds good, then Telefunken can have my money. If they say that the Telfunken sounds good, but the Apex sounds just as good (or at least really close) than Apex may get my $1400 and I can have 6 of em:D


...as in many of the "blindfold style" mic shootouts, some of the Chinese bargain-brand mics have been known to meet or beat the highend Euro-mics at their own game...I have to think that the pictures are too damning to be ignored, regardless of what people think they hear when auditioning these 2 mics...I emphasize "think they hear", when you have a comparison between two brands so diametrically opposed (as far as price/rep/history goes)...the M16 has been described as "more detailed...better high end...more presence" than many classic mics (by Dan-O)...maybe one man's "more detailed" is another man's "harsh high end"...Tele got caught...and the tweaking of a few caps and tube "upgrade" can't possibly make an $1100. difference...sorry to be redundant, but that's just IMHO...
 
This thread made me appreciate the craftsmanship of other innovative mic companies -- at a suprisingly low sticker price.

Take the Gefell M930/M940, for example:
hand-built capsules (from a country with very high labor costs), and a lot of propriety technologies, such as the optically isolated capsule amplifier, acoustically modeled body, etc -- for a price of "only" $1000.-, which is LESS than Telefunken charges for a Chinese-made+assembled mic with two new caps and a pathetic paint job!
 
To be honestly: I was always a bit suspicous about the corporate philosophy of Telefunken/USA: why did they buy the rights to the German name Telefunken in the first place?? If there's a bunch of people who feel that they have great ideas and potentials to bring phantastic products to the consumer, why would they do this under the name of a dysfunct older company with who that have nothing to do?? There can only be one reason: to benefit from the "glory" of the name and make fast cash! This thread seems to underline that "philosophy", which I find pathetic.
 
Giganova said:
This thread made me appreciate the craftsmanship of other innovative mic companies -- at a suprisingly low sticker price.

Take the Gefell M930/M940, for example:
hand-built capsules (from a country with very high labor costs), and a lot of propriety technologies, such as the optically isolated capsule amplifier, acoustically modeled body, etc -- for a price of "only" $1000.-, which is LESS than Telefunken charges for a Chinese-made+assembled mic with two new caps and a pathetic paint job!

There's always a real thing available for the price of some other guy's mic of questionable origin. I do think the Chinese mic landscape is changing due to investments in manufacturing facilities by certain people outside of the normal OEM channels.

However, that said, Shure never stopped making mics. Audio-Technica keeps chugging along with some great products. Electro Voice still makes a few classic mics.

And, as you point out, Microtech-Gefell makes some great mics that are definitely the real thing.
 
kidvybes said:
...as in many of the "blindfold style" mic shootouts, some of the Chinese bargain-brand mics have been known to meet or beat the highend Euro-mics at their own game...

For many in the mp3 generation I could see where they might chose the sounds they are used to hearing over the high end European sound, which would be unfamiliar to their ears. Of course, they could have wax in their ears, but that's not as likely, just probable.
 
kidvybes said:
...well, another person has done a direct comparison...again with similar results...these mics don't just look the same...they definately sound similar, with the Tele having a noticeably higher noise floor!...read on:

http://recforums.prosoundweb.com/index.php/t/5298/3678/?SQ=72078467df9f1844b8df931f686e3f74
[/url]

Thats the same review from a link you posted earlier. It is the same person, just posted on two different forums. As far as I am concerned that still makes only 1 comparison review. That same person has a small number of posts on the both the forums as well. Who knows what really happened. It is all just so subjective. The harshness that is mentioned by him in the Telefunken does not seem to be mentioned in any other reviews of the Telefunken. It does however seem to be a commonality of pretty much all of the Apex reviews. Telefunken has stated that they test every capsule and make adjustments on them when they come in. Now if they are actually doing what they say and not using those that don't meet their criteria (whatever that criteria may be) that means that they are basically throwing away some of those capsules. That also increases their per mic cost. There is also labor involved in dissassembling every mic, changing caps, resistors and wiring, testing, tuning, reassembling etc.... If all of that is done by hand and done to every mic, then that can dramatically increase Telefunken's cost per mic, as well as can dramatically increase the Sonic qualities of the mic itself. As of yet, those parts are extremely inexpensive. Adding a new tube certainly does cost a little more as well. Then there is the repackaging of the mic which also costs time and money, the wooden box which adds a little more cost etc... I agree that the whole thing looks a little scary form the original article with the photos in it, but all the people who are complaining about it seem to not be looking at the important things, like how does the mic sound? All but one of the reviews based on the actual sound of the Telefunken mic are good. I have yet to see a good review of the Apex.

As far as the bench tests go, bench tests can often be very misleading when dealing with audio charts. Many studio monitors that are very cheap will often post results that are strikingly similar to some high end monitors. Yet when you put them side by side and actually listen to them they may sound radically different. The same goes with microphones and preamps. I agree that a chart can be useful as a starting point, but that is really about all it is good for. I do also believe that a Chinese mic can sound good. Just like a mic form anywhere can. It all depends on the initial design, and how well it is implemented in the manufacturing and assembly process.

I guess people just love drama though. It is kind of human nature.
 
xstatic said:
As far as the bench tests go, bench tests can often be very misleading when dealing with audio charts. Many studio monitors that are very cheap will often post results that are strikingly similar to some high end monitors. Yet when you put them side by side and actually listen to them they may sound radically different. The same goes with microphones and preamps.

i just thought that that bared repeating.
 
xstatic said:
Telefunken has stated that they test every capsule and make adjustments on them when they come in. Now if they are actually doing what they say and not using those that don't meet their criteria (whatever that criteria may be) that means that they are basically throwing away some of those capsules. That also increases their per mic cost. There is also labor involved in dissassembling every mic, changing caps, resistors and wiring, testing, tuning, reassembling etc.... If all of that is done by hand and done to every mic, then that can dramatically increase Telefunken's cost per mic, as well as can dramatically increase the Sonic qualities of the mic itself. As of yet, those parts are extremely inexpensive. Adding a new tube certainly does cost a little more as well. Then there is the repackaging of the mic which also costs time and money, the wooden box which adds a little more cost etc... .


X...I admire your position of "innocent until proven guilty", but I really think Tele's explanation is nothing more than spin...David Royer sold me his Mojave MA200 for $500.(assembled) using an ADK A51 body and capsule, but with entirely new PCB/circuitry and a Jensen transformer, not to mention power source and 7-pin cables...granted he has now amped that price up to $999. but that is due to his contracting the manufacturing of the body and capsule exclusively for his mic (he's no longer doing "radical" modding of stock OEM Chinese mics, which is what Tele's doing but in a very minor style by only replacing a few caps, the tube and supposedly "testing every capsule and transformer?"...I doubt it)...and Mojave's mic is completely assembled in the US by Royer's staff (basically many of the same people who build his ribbon mics at Royer) with top quality caps, tubes and transformers...a re-read of Tele's explanation for the cost of their mic still rings of "after-the-fact" spin to save face...:


Here's a reprint (for those of you who haven't yet read it) of the response on Gearslutz.com:

"In response to the similarities of the Apex 460 and the Telefunken / R-F-T M16:
As stated in our response earlier, Telefunken launched the R-F-T brand at the beginning of this year to satisfy the need for an affordably tube microphone that would appeal to the project studio and home consumer market. For the first time, we turned to overseas manufacturing to lower the cost of producing this new microphone line.
By designating this new R-F-T line, we separated the already existing, award winning Telefunken product line (which is completely made in the USA) from the new R-F-T line, which contains components made overseas.

We never claimed that R-F-T mics were manufactured in the United States, only that each microphone itself was hand assembled by the same techs who assembled the TEC award winning Ela M251, U47, Ela M270 and Ela M12 microphones here in our South Windsor, CT lab.

The R-F-T line has been almost two years in the making. We have spent several months researching, testing and analyzing dozens of microphone designs and shapes before settling on one design that happens to be similar to the Apex 460. That fact is that there are numerous manufacturers in Asia that produce the EXACT design as the R-F-T M16 microphone, cable, shockmount and psu included. It so happens at the time we chose our design for the M16 (almost 12 months ago) the Apex 460 wasn‚t distributed in the United States yet, let alone to the world‚s pro audio market. If you take the time and do the research, you will see that there are dozens of other microphone manufactures who use similar designs as each other. They share the same grill, chassis, power supply and cable, except they are branded differently.

We can assure you all that purchasing an Apex 460, or any other similar microphone design from an internet dealer, and purchasing an R-F-T M16 direct from our lab, are two completely different experiences. For starters, the mics DO NOT sound similar to each other.

THE COMPONENTS
- More than a half dozen components, including 4 high Meg resistors and 4 high quality capacitors are added to the stock circuit. These components add clarity to the fatiguing midrange, and smooth out the sometimes overly brittle high end associated with Chinese mics. As seen on the spectral graphs of the APEX mic posted earlier http://www.studioreviews.com/images/freq-large1.jpg

THE TUBE
- The cheap brand less Asian tube issued with most of these imported mics was unacceptable by our standards. The solution: an American made Phillips New Old Stock 12AX7 WA tube, with better tone, performance and longevity. The M16s tube circuit is based loosely on a C12VR design, with extra ambient air on the top. By including the Phillips 12AX7 and coupling it with a richer, darker capsule, we were able to establish a balance between the performance of the tube, the circuit and the capsule.

THE CAPSULE, THE TRANSFORMER
- the capsule design included in the R-F-T M16 is based on the German K67 style capsule, able to handle the quietest of dynamics along with the most excessive of sound pressure levels. This capsule style can be found in dozens of other manufacturers microphones. This is why we run both the capsules and transformers through a very intensive series of analytical tests and sequences before passing them for inclusion in the R-F-T M16.

THE CABLE
- As of today, each M16 shipped will now include the cable upgrade. A 7 pin cable made with Gotham Audio GAC7 cable. This is the same high quality cable issued with the Platinum and Professional series Telefunken microphones.

THE SERVICE, THE WARRANTY
- As far as we know, there is no other microphone manufacturer in the United States willing to work as close as we do to the end user. At any time, our sales staff is eager and willing to answer any questions anyone may have regarding the microphones, the manufacturing, and the proper applications. Not to mention that the staff of Telefunken North America has logged thousands of hours working with, repairing, rebuilding, using and listening to hundreds of vintage tube microphones, along with almost every new microphone on the block. Before we were manufacturers, we were dealers, and foremost, microphone USERS. We would never put the Telefunken badge on a product that we couldn‚t stand behind 100%. There for, each M16 is offered with a 1 year warranty and a complete money back guarantee. We repair dozens of vintage microphones each month and we can promise our return time on a repair (if ever needed!) would be significantly less than any other major microphone manufacturer in the United States, or even the entire Globe.


MARKETING, QUALITY CONTROL
When you purchase an R-F-T M16, you are purchasing a microphone that Telefunken North America stands behind 100%. The M16 features the superior sound and build quality we have worked so hard to sustain for the past 5 years. By designating the microphone R-F-T, we allow ourselves room in the product line to introduce well made, yet inexpensive microphones from overseas. We never stated that R-F-T microphones systems were made in the United States, only that the microphones them selves were hand assembled here in our lab, to the strict quality standards we set forth at the beginning. The quality associated with the Telefunken name is something many studios strive to associate with.

PACKAGING
The R-F-T M16 also comes packaged with the same American made silk lined wooden microphone box issued with our Professional and Platinum series mics. This is a $200 value alone. Preserving the microphone is as important as using it. As dealers of certain imported microphones in the past, we can speak from experience. There have been several occasions where imported microphones arrive damaged and broken from being assembled and packed so poorly. We take extensive care in assembling these systems so that they will ship properly to the end user.

Hopefully some of the points listed above will justify the price point we assigned to the R-F-T M16. The bottom line is that you can purchase a Chinese mic, from a dealer, and hope for the best with the over hyped high end and week and dimensionless sound qualities. Or you can purchase an R-F-T M16 and receive a microphone that has been electronically and cosmetically tailored by Telefunken North America. A microphone designed with the professional or project studio in mind, featuring a Phillips NOS 12AX7 tube, the highest quality electronic components, an American made oak wooden mic box, Gotham Audio GAC7 cable, an intensive quality control process and the service and knowledgeable staff unmatched by any microphone manufacturer.

In response to losing any credibility..

We can reassure you that ALL TELEFUNKEN PRO AND PLATINUM MICROPHONES ARE 100% MANUFACTURED IN OUR SOUTH WINDSOR, CT - USA FACTORY (the only exception being a few parts made in Europe to ensure original specifications). 100% of the assembly and testing is done by Telefunken North America technicians. We welcome anyone to visit us and see how we make and manufacture our products. Let us make it very clear that Telefunken North America and R-F-T Microphones and Electronics are two independent companies from each other. They have separate websites, separate products and separate missions. Telefunken North America‚s mission is to MANUFACTURE the award winning Ela M 251, Ela M12, U47, Ela M 270 stereo microphones and DISTRIBUTES the R-F-T M16.

LASTLY
-Because of all the activity on the GearSlutz message board, our phones have been ringing off the hook, with sales! We can not assemble these systems fast enough. Regardless of how close the M16 may be to another microphone, it is NOT the same and it DOES NOT SOUND THE SAME. Bottom line is, the R-F-T M16 and the APEX 460 may happen to share a similar capsule, transformer, power supply, and shockmount, but they don‚t share the same SOUND. Prove it to yourself by demoing an M16 straight from our lab. We offer a complete money back guarantee on all our R-F-T microphone systems. Just cross your fingers that we still have them in stock."
__________________
-- Kind Regards,

Toni R. Fishman

“Built to a standard not a price.”
 
Last edited:
I don't know if anyone has noticed, but this has ceased to be an interesting controversy.
 
xstatic said:
As far as the bench tests go, bench tests can often be very misleading when dealing with audio charts. Many studio monitors that are very cheap will often post results that are strikingly similar to some high end monitors. Yet when you put them side by side and actually listen to them they may sound radically different. The same goes with microphones and preamps. I agree that a chart can be useful as a starting point, but that is really about all it is good for. I do also believe that a Chinese mic can sound good. Just like a mic form anywhere can. It all depends on the initial design, and how well it is implemented in the manufacturing and assembly process.

I guess people just love drama though. It is kind of human nature.

This whole thing doesn't mean much to me, but I’d like to know how two microphones composed of identical electronics and tested on a TEF workstation revealing nearly identical frequency curves and phase properties can sound entirely different. And if that isn't enough, the no-tamper paint on the capsule screws are the same on both mics. Hmm…no one needs to hit me over the head.
 
Well, I guess I am the only one here who is not anti telefunken now. you guys win:D
 
xstatic said:
Well, I guess I am the only one here who is not anti telefunken now. you guys win:D
I like them, I've bought mics from Toni that's why it sucks they are playing these kind of games.
 
How would you feel if you go to a Mercedes Benz showroom to have a look at their latest entry-model sedan, the guy tells you that the cars are hand-assembled in Stuttgart with the highest quality control, only to find out that its a Korean KIA with a different dashboard and a paint job? How would that reflect on Mercedes Benz as a high-end car manufacturer?
 
Oh man, I had no idea Mercedes was doing that, too. I'm totally never buying a Mercedes.





:D
 
xstatic said:
...snip...
the important things, like how does the mic sound?
...snip...
I guess people just love drama though. It is kind of human nature.

good stuff but I can still see both sides having a point.



kidvybes said:
...snip...
Here's a reprint (for those of you who haven't yet read it) of the response on Gearslutz.com:
...snip...Regardless of how close the M16 may be to another microphone, it is NOT the same and it DOES NOT SOUND THE SAME. Bottom line is, the R-F-T M16 and the APEX 460 may happen to share a similar capsule, transformer, power supply, and shockmount, but they don‚t share the same SOUND. Prove it to yourself by demoing an M16 straight from our lab. We offer a complete money back guarantee on all our R-F-T microphone systems. Just cross your fingers that we still have them in stock."
__________________
-- Kind Regards,

Toni R. Fishman

“Built to a standard not a price.”

That's still interesting to me....and I have a feeling that at this point in my ear development, I couldn't hear the diff. Maybe, hopefully in a few years, so in the meantime, I just might go w/ the affordable, so-called inferior mics and demo the good stuff when I can afford it. After all, I need something to compare it to. I'll rent a bunch in a few weeks maybe to see if my 'ear' getting any closer.

Good posts, thanks for the info, this place rocks.
 
Look Familiar

This mic has has been sold continuously on the open market for the last 6 years and no one seems to have embraced it yet. So what's all the fuss about this time???

So what if Telefunken wants to make a big profit off its name. ADK sells the same old mic design from Shanghai for way more money than NADY, Marshall and some others do. So does SE...At least Telefunken has the ability to do something about the design. APEX is owned by a music store in Canada. There are no APEX microphone designers. They pick out what they want from a microphone company catalog in Taiwan as so many have before them.

Printouts from a TEF will prove nothing. A graph will not tell you how
any microphone will sound...in fact, looking at the specifications of
any mic will not accurately portray its characteristics, especially
given the conditions of the room it will be used in. It does help in the
marketing of the product. If this mic was so good, it would have been
known a long time ago.

No disrespect to any of these manufacturers. This is just my opinion on the matter...
 
Back
Top