Instrumental Metal Tune, Drop A Tuning

  • Thread starter Thread starter monkeymanx
  • Start date Start date
M

monkeymanx

New member
Download Song

Here is a rough mix of something I'm working on. I'm going to be retracking the guitars, and adding bass soon... Plus drum fills and such soon. Let me know what you think so far.

I used Drumkits From Hell Superior for the drums, Pod XT Pro for the guitar... I have Cubase SX 3 as my host, and a slew of plugins... Syths are Sampletank.
 
monkeymanx said:
Download Song

Here is a rough mix of something I'm working on. I'm going to be retracking the guitars, and adding bass soon... Plus drum fills and such soon. Let me know what you think so far.

I used Drumkits From Hell Superior for the drums, Pod XT Pro for the guitar... I have Cubase SX 3 as my host, and a slew of plugins... Syths are Sampletank.

hmmmm I would like to hear this when its done. I like it so far.
Drums sound awesome so far (wish I had DFH!!!)
You said you are going to retrack the guitars so I won't comment on them ( i dont really like the lead tone you used...........too much chorus or something IMHO). The synths make me think of Faith No More lol.........(which is a good thing)
Good Job.........I like the ending too
Please repost when you are done......I will be waiting ;-)
 
Not a big fan of the low tunings, whatever floats your boat though. The synths against the downtuned guitars has a Fear Factory vibe. You said you were going to retrack the guitars but Im going to comment anyways for your consideration when tracking. I would use alot less gain and just double track to get the thickness. As it stands right now the guitars are just buzzy and small sounding, entirely to much gain on rhythm and probably even the lead. Has a Meshuggah vibe in some places too. I like the overal feel but the guitar sound kills it IMHO. Excellent playing regardless though, would like to hear more.
 
I like where you are headed so far.....Cool tune. Drums and guitars seem to fit together well......and I won't comment on stuff others already have. Can't wait to hear the finished product as I really like this type of music. Drop A....7 string with B detuned, or whole guitar down 1 step?
Ed
 
Well, I have a Baritone 6 string... Came standard B to B tuning just dropped it to A to A tuning. 14 to 68 guage strings are awsome for this... Much bigger strings than even my friends 7 string, which I don't like... I just never really liked the feel of 7 string guitars.

The guitars are actually double tracked... Maybe that is why it sounds like it has alot of gain/drive... I've been trying to find the sweet spot where it still maintains good clarity on the guitar. I'm also going to try a couple different panning styles.

The guitars may sound a bit thin though with the absence of bass for right now. Also, I'll try doing leads without the chorus effect and see how it works out, maybe just use a delay effect on it... I've never really done much as far as leads, so I'm still kind of new to getting a good lead sound...

Thanks for the comments, hopefully I can finish this one up by weeks end.
 
Hey man, really cool song. Drums sound great (I've gotta say that as I use DFHS too! ;) ), but seriously, they do. I would like to hear it after you've added some fills, etc. as you've said.
I must say, the guitar tone ain't working for me. I for one am dead set against those low tunings, so I realize my opinions on that don't really apply. (I'm one of those freaks of nature that likes to play metal in standard tuning - imagine that?). However I still think you could get a much more focused sound when you retrack this thing. WAY, WAY less distortion, did I say WAY, WAY?.....I meant to say WAY, WAY, WAY less distortion.... :D ...sorry just trying to make a point there. I think what Wireneck means is that when you double track, each track would probably sound too weak on its own. You would use a much cleaner and tighter (way less) distortion for each track. Then perhaps even record 4 or more tracks to get it thickened up. If you have not tried it this way, work with it, I bet you'll like the results.
 
Wow, this really sounds good. The drums are sweet. Not to steal this thread but can anyone explain to me what the drum kits from hell plug in does? Is it just a package of samples that you trigger through midi or is it loops?
 
I am going to go against the norm here and say I REALLY dug the rythm guitar tone. GREAT job!! I LOVE that dirty, mean, nasy sound. You play the low tunings very precisely witch is critical to keeping it sounding tight. I would go with a lead sound that was a bit less effected, but what you have could be very cool if you build on it. The backing keys could use bit more.....atmosphere and grit. They need more shit going on inside them. As it is they do sound like a FF imitation. But, as a whole, NICE!!! :D All you need is a tight, solid bass guitar to fill it out, someone who can SING in tune and carry a melody, and you've got a GREAT sound!! Bravo!!

I don't WHAT the hell people a talking about when the say "turn the gain WAAAY down" and "I don't care for low tunings" - it's GOT to be a matter of personal preference. When I turn my gain down the sound reminds me of 90's hair metal or even 70's rock. Not at all what I want. And IMO, standard tunings for metal is a castrated sound that is about as mean as a kitten.

Keep going where your sound is leading you. It is VERY cool to hear some aggressive, mean shit on this board. :cool: :D
 
I'm going to try a couple different things with the tune... I may do some stuff that is more involved with the keys... I have a 49 key controller, but I'm not really a keyboard or piano player... I just go with what sounds good. That is why the keys are more simplistic like Fear Factory.

Back in the day I used to tune D to D, which was good... Then one day about 3 years ago I decided to get some larger strings and go to B because it sounded cool when I would goof around and tune low. Now I have the baritone and actually prefer A... I probalby wouldn't go any lower than that though.

I'm still not sure about vocals... I kind of like instrumental stuff... Also, I'm sort of sick of hearing people scream over heavy tracks, too much stuff is like that. I may try to lay some tracks to see how it works out since I have idea for vocals, but with the leads and the keys and such, I think it will end up speaking for itself, well, hopefully.
 
O and as far as DFH Superior, when you buy that one, it has around 35GB of drum samples and has its own VST plugin to trigger them. The different thing about this though is that you can turn on and off different mic bleed settings... So if you want your snare to bleed into the right tom but not the high hat, you can do that... It is very flexible... Also, it is unprocessed samples... It took me about 5 months of usage and getting used to everything to learn how to properly process drums to get a good sound. The original DFH is already processed, but to me, I like the results I get from DFHS much better, plus the flexibility of unprocessed sounds is awsome.
 
Zed10R said:
I don't WHAT the hell people a talking about when the say "turn the gain WAAAY down" and "I don't care for low tunings" - it's GOT to be a matter of personal preference. When I turn my gain down the sound reminds me of 90's hair metal or even 70's rock. Not at all what I want. And IMO, standard tunings for metal is a castrated sound that is about as mean as a kitten.

I did point out that tuning is totally a matter of personal preference..... But as far as the less distortion thing.....I think you're missing the point. I like a really aggressive sound as well, but layering a few tracks of cleaner guitars will add alot to the clarity and tightness and will sound just as crunchy and distorted as one really high gain track, if not more, but it will have alot more definition and detail instead of being a big mushy wash. The point is not at all to sound like "70's rock", as you stated.....

And regarding my opinion on low tunings, I just happen to think guitars sound way better when they are presented in the register that they were meant to occupy, with the bass handling the low-end, call me crazy, it's just my opinion. I think chords ring truer, note definition is better, etc. I like the little bit of extra meat you can get from tuning to say D, but I just don't like it any lower than that. And by the way, many of the heaviest albums I know are done in standard or maybe D tuning.....Nothing against low tunings when they are presented well and especially when the playing is super tight, as it is here. (good job by the way) I'm not asking the guy to change tunings, as I clearly stated. I just thought the song could benefit alot from a tighter guitar sound.
 
I don't WHAT the hell people a talking about when the say "turn the gain WAAAY down" and "I don't care for low tunings" - it's GOT to be a matter of personal preference. When I turn my gain down the sound reminds me of 90's hair metal or even 70's rock. Not at all what I want. And IMO, standard tunings for metal is a castrated sound that is about as mean as a kitten.

Metal players are NOTORIUS for bad tone. Your outlook is a prime example of why this statement is true more often than not. I am by no means a pro but if there is one thing that I have learned from experience its that Engineering is all about deception. Those guitars that you think are so incredibly gainy and kicking your ass in the face are hi-passed, have very small amounts of gain and are double, tripled, even quadruple tracked. They generally if not always will sound like total ass solo'd but thats not the point because they are going to be played back in a Mix right? Call me crazy but I bet ALOT of people will agree.
As for the low tunings. It is in fact a personal preference. I find it annoying because it is harder to distinguish individual notes tuned that low. If all your doing is chug chug chug rhythm stuff it typically works but when you start trying to add in chords with alot of voicings it can often turn to shit.
 
  • Like
Reactions: NL5
Wireneck said:
Metal players are NOTORIUS for bad tone. Your outlook is a prime example of why this statement is true more often than not. I am by no means a pro but if there is one thing that I have learned from experience its that Engineering is all about deception. Those guitars that you think are so incredibly gainy and kicking your ass in the face are hi-passed, have very small amounts of gain and are double, tripled, even quadruple tracked. They generally if not always will sound like total ass solo'd but thats not the point because they are going to be played back in a Mix right? Call me crazy but I bet ALOT of people will agree.
As for the low tunings. It is in fact a personal preference. I find it annoying because it is harder to distinguish individual notes tuned that low. If all your doing is chug chug chug rhythm stuff it typically works but when you start trying to add in chords with alot of voicings it can often turn to shit.

Good point, my thoughts exactly!
 
Well, low tuning works better with the baritone and the big strings... The notes and chords are much more defined. I would say on standard guitars with something like 13 - 56 guage strings, the notes just blend together and are kind of muddy.

I'm going to turn the gain and drive down quite a bit and try it with 4 guitar tracks. Going to do a Hard left and hard right pan... The other 2 tracks will be a slight pan away from center... I'm going to sell how this works out. I've read about people recording 10 guitar tracks to make it beefy... If it works though, it works.
 
I don't care what anyone says...this is really cool. Very creative and well executed.
However, I havn't considered going to drop A...drop C is the closest I've come, but mainly drop D.
I'm very interested to see how it comes out with multiple tracks...although I think it sounds fine the way it is now.
 
evhwanabe said:
Drums sound awesome so far (wish I had DFH!!!)
Yeah well Andy Wallace was one of the engineers that recorded the DFH samples so! or was it BFD, shit cant remember.

Mix sounds not bad.
Look forward to it being finished.
Drums dont seem to fit right though, just my ears. Its like the kick drum is too present and consistent which makes it sound a little fake. Ans each snare hit sounds the same.
Do you not get different snare hits of the same drum on DFH?
 
metalhead28 said:
I did point out that tuning is totally a matter of personal preference..... But as far as the less distortion thing.....I think you're missing the point. I like a really aggressive sound as well, but layering a few tracks of cleaner guitars will add alot to the clarity and tightness and will sound just as crunchy and distorted as one really high gain track, if not more, but it will have alot more definition and detail instead of being a big mushy wash. The point is not at all to sound like "70's rock", as you stated.....

And regarding my opinion on low tunings, I just happen to think guitars sound way better when they are presented in the register that they were meant to occupy, with the bass handling the low-end, call me crazy, it's just my opinion. I think chords ring truer, note definition is better, etc. I like the little bit of extra meat you can get from tuning to say D, but I just don't like it any lower than that. And by the way, many of the heaviest albums I know are done in standard or maybe D tuning.....Nothing against low tunings when they are presented well and especially when the playing is super tight, as it is here. (good job by the way) I'm not asking the guy to change tunings, as I clearly stated. I just thought the song could benefit alot from a tighter guitar sound.

:p I admit my post was confrontational. I did not mean it to be that way. I know, understand, and respect everyone's opinion and I hope to learn from you all.

Having said that, if it is possible to sound tight, clear, and well defined with loads of gain, and it is, why not layer that 4 or 6 times? I really like the harmonic depth it gives, too. And I have tried to turn the gain down as many have reccomended. I just don't dig the sound. At all. It's not for lack of trying.

And nowhere does it say that the guitar is "meant" to be tuned any one way. There is no correct or proper tuning. Everything is relative. When the guitar is tuned to A, the bass is still the bass. Just bassier.

Sound is, as you stated, subjective. I think this guys playing is very tight. I think the SOUND ITSELF is tight. I don't think standard tuning would make it sound tighter. It would sound smaller and thinner, but not tighter. I really dig it. IMO, standard E tuning just does not have balls. But that doesn't mean I don't love Metallica's early music......or Sepultura's old shit.....or nearly everything that S.O.D. recorded......I could go on.




Wireneck said:
Metal players are NOTORIUS for bad tone. Your outlook is a prime example of why this statement is true more often than not. I am by no means a pro but if there is one thing that I have learned from experience its that Engineering is all about deception. Those guitars that you think are so incredibly gainy and kicking your ass in the face are hi-passed, have very small amounts of gain and are double, tripled, even quadruple tracked. They generally if not always will sound like total ass solo'd but thats not the point because they are going to be played back in a Mix right? Call me crazy but I bet ALOT of people will agree.
As for the low tunings. It is in fact a personal preference. I find it annoying because it is harder to distinguish individual notes tuned that low. If all your doing is chug chug chug rhythm stuff it typically works but when you start trying to add in chords with alot of voicings it can often turn to shit.

To you Sir, ditto the I didn't mean to be confrontational. I really didn't. :p

All I know for fact is, I tune to "C" and the occasional "B", I use all kinds of chords with different voicings, and a lot of chords that are dissonant. I would never allow my sound to be muddy, and I would never allow the notes to be indistinct. I have gotten compliments from die hard "E" tuning fanatics that the tone I get is really good. My music relies on the listeners ability to hear everything that's going on. I have my gain almost maxed out, and I layer each rythm part at least 4 times.

I honestly believe that the notion of down tuned guitars sounding muddy and indestinct is a myth and easily disproven. There are planty of people who make standard tuning sound muddy and indistinct. If you just don't LIKE the sound, I have no objection.

Again, I hope to learn from you all and I did not mean to be....mean. :D
 
man... this has some real possibilities...

consider doubling or quadruple tracking the guitar starting at 00:42. I expected to have my head blown off...

great start... get the guitars wider and for Drop-A not heavy enough for me...

nice so far
 
Last edited:
Back
Top