Tribute bands "copy cats??"
Oh, brother.
Based on that simplistic statement, I can only assume you're not a musician that's moved by music. Let me dumb it down a bit so we can gain an understanding...
I've seen a few Rush cover bands in my day, and was largely disappointed by them, mainly because the music means so much to me. They were obviously oustanding musicians (NJ's Power Windows, for one), but I never heard anything that really moved me...something was always missing. Either a synth patch was not right, a guitar solo was too improvised, or the singing didn't sound like classic Geddy. I would think to myself, "how can they just play it wrong like that?" I.e., I would take offense to a performance that didn't give Rush's music the *effort* and *dedication* it deserved. (And I also think the "Working Man" tribute was a fiasco, from the overactive lungs of Sebastian Bach to the annoyingly persistent double bass usage of Mike Portnoy).
I've been a huge Rush fan since the late '70s and all I can say is that playing their music, and playing it accurately, allows us to connect with it on a much deeper level and reach an emotional stimulus unlike that of simply listening to a CD. Have you ever played "air-guitared" to a song? You probably have, and that was because you were moved by the music to do so. Are you a "copy cat" because you're doing it? No. The tribute band thing is very similar, but just a lot more intense. What makes it so appealing is that we can share that emotional release and celebrate Rush's music with fellow fans--just like us--who can't wait for the next tour to hear some live Rush.
Other than that, it's fun. Damn fun--makes me feel like I'm a kid again. We're certainly not in it for the money, just like all cover bands, and if you can't have fun with something in this short life of ours, than I guess that sucks for you.
Bill
2112
"We have assumed control..."
www.rushtributeband2112.com