vox said:
Ok, so basically what you are saying is that when you hear somebody shouting from 100 yds away all you will hear of their voice is the 60 hz content?
I didnt say anything about 60Hz.... A shouter will add harmonics due to his shouting and change the freq content by doing so.
Therfore the low content will not be the only factor.
What you said about low frequencies is correct but the sound has to have significant amounts of low frequency power to start with.
Try a simple experiment, put a boom box at one end of a room and play a cd at moderate volume, walk slowly away from it and listen to how that sound changes, first you lose the extreme highs, then the low bass, eventually all you hear is the mids.
I know all about Fletcher Munson.....
How we preceive volume is a combination of several things.
From Volume to waveform and of course....Fletcher.
Above..... what you wrote, means you agree with me that the first to be lost are the highs. and as I wrote the first priority is lowering the volume which relates to the fletcher theory as well.
As to the waveform - A airplane and a flute both at the same volume, the flute will not sound louder yet
WILL sound lower in volume due to the waveform.
When you want to make a sound move back, No EQ change will move it back drasticly. Even worse....you will probably hurt the sound rolling off highs as a means to move it back.
It is meant to be used as a combination with other moves like reverb, Delay.....
Eq cuts alone will tend to make your sound lower and higher rather then move back.
To adjust Eq so that you have a mid range sound by rolling off highs and lows will leave you with a sound you hear even more
a 800-5k sound will Project foward. Humans are sensetive to mid range freq's. You would have to lower the volume as well.
Shailat, you are Da Man, but I think I got you on this one
I dont think so.....
