B
Beck
Guest
I don't know anything about disagreements between ZEE and Farview, so I can't speak to that. I have seen some exchanges between ZEE and someone who wears a “silly” hat, which apparently is on too tight.
But anyone who gives DR ZEE Negative for the discussions I've seen is just not the sharpest tool in the shed.
It’s really amusing to me to see a bunch of no-talent Nazis come to a music forum and pick on the people that are the most artistic and talented… in my book, the people who give the forum character. There are other forums that don’t allow character by order of the management. In that case you may be happier at one of those.
My underlying premise is that the rep system is so broken that no one should be giving negative rep for any reason. And we certainly shouldn’t let a red box, or string of red boxes by a person’s user name influence our opinion of them.
People like ZEE can be misunderstood, so don’t be so rash clicking away with your little mouse. All you are doing when you stoop to giving someone like ZEE bad rep is admitting how little gray matter you have to use.
Rep points on this forum may have meant something at one time, but now they are like penny stock.
I know of a certain member who has been on the forum about 5 months. ¾ of his posts are in the “New Rep Point Thread” begging for points. Consequently he has hundreds more rep points than another member I know that has been on this forum for 5 years, helping and contributing to our effort. The more rep points you have the more you bring someone down when you leave bad rep.
What does that member’s opinion mean? What has he done to earn the power he abuses? NOTHING!
Now if he can meet me face-to-face and survive it (he lives 1.5 hours from me, though he doesn’t know that, or how I know that, or know how I know he left me negative rep) then he will have earned some points. The good news for him is he lives near a White Castle, and you don’t really need any teeth to eat sliders. The fries may pose a challenge, but the shakes… well; you use a straw of course, so no big deal either.
But anyone who gives DR ZEE Negative for the discussions I've seen is just not the sharpest tool in the shed.
It’s really amusing to me to see a bunch of no-talent Nazis come to a music forum and pick on the people that are the most artistic and talented… in my book, the people who give the forum character. There are other forums that don’t allow character by order of the management. In that case you may be happier at one of those.
My underlying premise is that the rep system is so broken that no one should be giving negative rep for any reason. And we certainly shouldn’t let a red box, or string of red boxes by a person’s user name influence our opinion of them.
People like ZEE can be misunderstood, so don’t be so rash clicking away with your little mouse. All you are doing when you stoop to giving someone like ZEE bad rep is admitting how little gray matter you have to use.
Rep points on this forum may have meant something at one time, but now they are like penny stock.
I know of a certain member who has been on the forum about 5 months. ¾ of his posts are in the “New Rep Point Thread” begging for points. Consequently he has hundreds more rep points than another member I know that has been on this forum for 5 years, helping and contributing to our effort. The more rep points you have the more you bring someone down when you leave bad rep.
What does that member’s opinion mean? What has he done to earn the power he abuses? NOTHING!
Now if he can meet me face-to-face and survive it (he lives 1.5 hours from me, though he doesn’t know that, or how I know that, or know how I know he left me negative rep) then he will have earned some points. The good news for him is he lives near a White Castle, and you don’t really need any teeth to eat sliders. The fries may pose a challenge, but the shakes… well; you use a straw of course, so no big deal either.