analog v digital
i am not making an "analog is better than digital" argument. i record both to computer through an m-audio box and to 1/2" 8 track, depending on the project. i think they are both great.
if someone came up to me and asked me make their band sound like mid 90's indie rock, i would record them to tape. it just sounds right for that style of music.
sound quality aside, recording to tape creates a totally different work process. again- it compliments the indie rock style. in this case LESS editing is probably better. the lack of tracks will compliment the indie rock style of arraignment. and so on.
i have tried to replicate the sounds on a computer with lots of the magneto plug-in everywhere and so on. but it doesnt sound the same. not that it sounds bad- it just doesnt sound like tape. hip-hop, electro, new new wave (or, umm... hate to say it- electroclash), and so on-- all great for computer recording. but indie rock?
anyway, i stand by my advice for to_see_me.
however, given that he is going to stick with the d12 (at least for the time being- really- borrow a tape machine at some point: they are very fun and i think you will be very happy with the results) i would recomend...
*getting a sansamp for the drums.
*reamping the vocals.
*getting a spring reverb unit of some sort- furman, tapco, orban, akg, demeter. for vocals, drums, etc.
*get some beyer ribbon mics, a couple 57s, some EV mics.
*some outboard compression for color (dont get an RNC, sounds too much like computer based compression. maybe an ashly)
*here is some indie rock mic advice
http://www.discmakers.com/music/pse/mic3.html