cjacek
Analogue Enthusiast
I like that it's all laid out for you, based on the type of recorder, its record gap and bias recommendations for several popular RMGI tapes / speeds.
(Yes, our beloved TASCAM is also mentioned!
)
I guess you can use those for Quantegy equivalents as well. The SM911 = Q 456 and SM900 = Q 499. Not mentioned is the LPR35 (1mil vers of 911) so the bias should be the same, as is for 1mil Q product like the 457 and 407.
I've heard there's a good review of the SM468 in the February issue of Recording.
(Yes, our beloved TASCAM is also mentioned!
)I guess you can use those for Quantegy equivalents as well. The SM911 = Q 456 and SM900 = Q 499. Not mentioned is the LPR35 (1mil vers of 911) so the bias should be the same, as is for 1mil Q product like the 457 and 407.
I've heard there's a good review of the SM468 in the February issue of Recording.
Attachments
Last edited:
Good for them .... and .... of course .... for US!!