
cjacek
Analogue Enthusiast
I like that it's all laid out for you, based on the type of recorder, its record gap and bias recommendations for several popular RMGI tapes / speeds.
(Yes, our beloved TASCAM is also mentioned!
)
I guess you can use those for Quantegy equivalents as well. The SM911 = Q 456 and SM900 = Q 499. Not mentioned is the LPR35 (1mil vers of 911) so the bias should be the same, as is for 1mil Q product like the 457 and 407.
I've heard there's a good review of the SM468 in the February issue of Recording.
(Yes, our beloved TASCAM is also mentioned!

I guess you can use those for Quantegy equivalents as well. The SM911 = Q 456 and SM900 = Q 499. Not mentioned is the LPR35 (1mil vers of 911) so the bias should be the same, as is for 1mil Q product like the 457 and 407.
I've heard there's a good review of the SM468 in the February issue of Recording.
Attachments
Last edited: