mixmkr
we don't need rest!!
Thanks Glen, thanks masteringhouse. I appreciate your comments on this subject. I actually was first intrigued by using HarBal on individual tracks, for the reasons you listed.
I also agree with the "Golden rules", put into that context.
I realize that something like HarBal shouldn't replace a proper mix, but sometimes I've been put into situations to "blend" a variety of mixes together, that didn't necessarily have the benefit of that "proper" mix. I thought HarBal saved my backside in a couple of those situations.
I also thought the limiter function was a decent as any software hard limiter. But, maybe my ears aren't as experienced in these things as they should be.
I think we might be on the same page on some issues, but are having the "typed word" syndrome.
thanks for the replies.
I also agree with the "Golden rules", put into that context.
I realize that something like HarBal shouldn't replace a proper mix, but sometimes I've been put into situations to "blend" a variety of mixes together, that didn't necessarily have the benefit of that "proper" mix. I thought HarBal saved my backside in a couple of those situations.
I also thought the limiter function was a decent as any software hard limiter. But, maybe my ears aren't as experienced in these things as they should be.
I think we might be on the same page on some issues, but are having the "typed word" syndrome.
thanks for the replies.
I don't mean this as any sort of slam, but really ... the concept of it is a joke, and it has no real value in the real world, other than as a mastering EQ. And there are many free plugs that are much better at that, even.
I actually have tried some of the stuff, but honestly never use it. I have some Waves stuff, Voxengo and the stuff with Sonar PE, which I think is all better than most of the 1st page google listings. The Classic stuff aint too bad either for free.