A
allyn
New member
what would be a good recording mic for under $400. I was thinking of the shure ksm27, but im not really sure. any advise on what to get would be great
Middleman said:Rodes NTK mic
BigBrotherMotow said:Can you tell me where to get it for that price???
Everywhere I go they want $500.00
I really like the sound of it but don't want to spend quite that much.
Thanks
BigBrotherMotow said:Can you tell me where to get it for that price???
Everywhere I go they want $500.00
I really like the sound of it but don't want to spend quite that much.
Thanks
Warhead said:the NTK can rock on many vocals but can be a bit sibilant at times...
hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhaaaaaahahaahahahachessrock said:Kinda' like how the pope can be a bit Catholic at times.![]()
You might try a tube mic or the ribbon. A figure 8 mic has very high side rejection so you would have to place the two singers directly across from each other and hope that they are equally loud since I can't think of an easy way to boost one side of the mic but not the other.mshilarious said:Can I hijack this thread for a question?
As mentioned above I've got an SM7 which is great for me, and a KSM27 which I like on some other people, but I've been thinking about my next vocal mic. What is the most different sound I could I get for around $300? One pending session this summer will be bluegrass, so something for that might be nice. I've been considering ribbons like maybe an M160, or even the M130. Does the figure eight work well for two singers at once?
Thoughts? Other suggestions?
You balance the levels on a figure 8 mic by moving the singers closer or further away from their side of the mic. That's how it's been done for almost 60 years. It works very well, too.Innovations said:You might try a tube mic or the ribbon. A figure 8 mic has very high side rejection so you would have to place the two singers directly across from each other and hope that they are equally loud since I can't think of an easy way to boost one side of the mic but not the other.