good mixer for 4-track recording

  • Thread starter Thread starter o-ron
  • Start date Start date
O

o-ron

New member
I'm looking for a decent budget mixer that will handle 4-track recording (simultaneous 4-track output - how does this equate to number of busses??).
The more mono/mic/XLR inputs the better as I have little need for stereo TRS inputs.
Something I would need a minimum of 4 mono mic inputs, 8 would be plenty, and 12 or more would be a bit overkill. Phantom power is a MUST.

Effects would be neat, but totally unnecessary.

I've been looking at this one, but it seems a bit more than I need:

http://www.behringer.com/02_products/prodindex.cfm?id=MX1804X&lang=eng&formval=0

I'm looking for something good quality, but my budget is <$300. I have no problem buying used (ebay, etc.)

Thanks!
 
I'm using a laptop for recording (running windows xp and cool edit pro)

Currently I just use the built in soundcard which gives surprisingly good results, but limits me to 2-in/2-out recording (in fact, I haven't tested, but i don't think this soundcard is full duplex). I will soon be upgrading to the Audiosport Quattro (or something similar) to **hopefully* get 4-in recording capabilities.

Thanks
 
$300 is the limiting factor. If you do a search on Mixers, you'll get all the advice you could ask for. If I were you, I would look for a used mixer. Behringer mixers in particular, have a very bad rep on this site.
Bob
 
I plan on purchasing a used mixer.

I guess I should have mentioned that.

Best used mixer for above mentioned specs and prices?

Thanks
 
I would still go with berhinger. I think they are great mixers for the money. all though I have only used a couple mixers in my lifetime

Will
 
how are the mic pre-amps on the Behringer mixers? I've heard that the pre-amps on the Mackie mixers (what I'm currently looking at) are quite good in comparison to most.

I'll be using an AKG C1000S, Marshall 2003's, possibly some Marshall 603's, and probably some Behringer ECM8000's. (all condensers. Occasionally I use Shure SM57 dynamics)

THanks
 
I think the pre amps on the behringer mixers are pretty good. Not like a mackie mixer but as far as your going to find they're better than most.
 
I think as it stands now, i'd probably be best off with a used Mackie 1604VLZ or 1402VLZ. (not the "pro" versions)

But i'm keeping an eye on those behringers, as I could get a new one for the same price.
 
o-ron, IMO you'd be better off getting a used mackie because:
1) They are built better than Behringer
2) Better service support
3) Better mic pres and EQ (the Behringers are quite harsh)
4) Behringer rips off other companies by "reverse engineering".

This is coming from someone who owns a Behringer 802A mixer....
 
find someone that has a berhinger and a mackie and just go test them out.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top