N
newatthis
New member
Again, I am very new at this, and obviously still much to learn. My situation is,,, my band just recorded 7 tunes today into my ADAT machines (hopefully soon to be replaced by a Mackie HD24 recorder). Anyway, now that we recorded the "scratch/reference tracks" all together live, we want to seperately lay each track down to get rid of the bleed over from all the open mics we had while recording.
Question: I was going to burn the scratch/reference tunes we recorded onto a CD via my Alesis Masterlink, then run those songs into the headphones as reference tracks (to play along with), while recording all new seperate tracks all over again as the masters for the final mixdown.
Should I do it this way>??>? or just overdub each track thats already layed down that we did today, thus replacing/overbubbing the ones we recorded for the scratch/reference tracks??
Which works better?
The scratch/reference recordings sound pretty decent as they are for a newB, if it didnt have all the bleed between all the open mics that were being used. It makes mixdown a bitch to isolate certain instruments you only want.
Does my question even make sense>?>?
Any help or advice would be appreciated.
Thanks
AJ
Question: I was going to burn the scratch/reference tunes we recorded onto a CD via my Alesis Masterlink, then run those songs into the headphones as reference tracks (to play along with), while recording all new seperate tracks all over again as the masters for the final mixdown.
Should I do it this way>??>? or just overdub each track thats already layed down that we did today, thus replacing/overbubbing the ones we recorded for the scratch/reference tracks??
Which works better?
The scratch/reference recordings sound pretty decent as they are for a newB, if it didnt have all the bleed between all the open mics that were being used. It makes mixdown a bitch to isolate certain instruments you only want.
Does my question even make sense>?>?

Any help or advice would be appreciated.
Thanks
AJ