
yag
Still Newbie
I will also recommend you to try the yamahas, I have been owning one for 8-9 years and pretty happy with it.
hate to say this but you are soooo wrong.........finsihes make a huge difference in sound on most guitars.........there are exceptions to every rule.......
most guys who want a cleaner sound want nitro..........
most of the metal guys actually prefer poly finishes......
depends on the sounds u want...........
Violin makers have known for centuries that one the most important things is the finish.
There's still a market for $30K+ violins, actually a waiting list. You don't find that in guitars, and because of that most guitars are finished with modern finishes. The expensive violins are still finished the old way.
This site had a big effect on me:
http://www.mother-of-tone.com/lacquer.htm
I've made a few cabinets along the lines of what he says there, with homemade varnish and I'm convinced he's on to something, which isn't really something new but something very old.
The way most guitars are finished came from the advances the DuPont Company made in car paints for Henry Ford 100 years ago, and it's based on making things quickly and great looking, not for aural reasons.
You give me two identical guitars (as identical as they can be, given that they're wood) with one being a nitro finish and one being poly, and I assert that the player's technique will be far more important than the finish at determining the sound that comes out of the amp.
I offer David Gilmour as a prime example of a player that imposes an unmistakable tonality on every guitar he plays, by dint of technique.
I suspect you're right.One of these days I'm gonna take a cheap solidbodied guitar and record it through a clean amp. Then I'm gonna slather it with a thick layer of latex house paint and let it dry a few days and record it again on the same settings. I'm not saying it won't make any difference, but I bet it won't make as much difference as many would expect.