chamelious
www.thesunexplodes.com
That's not 'opinion', that's pretty much 'fact'.
Yeah- but if i'd phrased it like that someone would have said NO ITS NOT I USE ONE GUITAR AND IT SOUNDS AMAZING YOU'RE WRONG IM RIGHT LOLZ LOOSER!!!111oneonetwo
That's not 'opinion', that's pretty much 'fact'.
They can be tricky to get synched.
I'd be inclined to disagree. I find the doubling a easier than laying down the first track TBH, because when playing the second time round I've got the first track to groove with. If a guitarist can't play in time with himself, then how in heck is he giong to play in sync with a band?
A lot of time with the music I write, cutting and pasting isn't an option (and it sounds like shit even if it is). The rhythm guitars are often harmonized in places rather than just playing a carbon copy of each other.
I meant if you want it to sound like one performance the tracks have to be right on with each other.
If you are talking in the sense of one performace = one person playing... you want it to sound like one performance, you record one performance.
I play fast death and thrash metal. For the most part, my tracks have to be right on. There is very little leeway there. It ain't one performance. It's 2 performances. 2 guitars. I'm not under any illusions of trying to make that sound like 1 guitar. 2 guitars at different ends of the stereo field does not, and never will, sound like 1 guitar.
Sometimes I abandon the first track and use the tighter later tracks. But what I meant if you want it to sound like one performance the tracks have to be right on with each other. Yes it is cool to have the guitars weaving in and out also. it is all good.
VP
I'd be inclined to disagree. I find the doubling a easier than laying down the first track TBH, because when playing the second time round I've got the first track to groove with. If a guitarist can't play in time with himself, then how in heck is he giong to play in sync with a band?
A lot of time with the music I write, cutting and pasting isn't an option (and it sounds like shit even if it is). The rhythm guitars are often harmonized in places rather than just playing a carbon copy of each other.
What's up, guys? I do everything by a rule. If I am recording something for myself, I do what I want. If I am recording something for other people, I do what they are used to. The commonality is doubled guitars. Pantera, Sublime, Green Day. They double. why? Because that's the only way to get true stereo. Doubling behind a solo can go either way, but the big picture is that you're not giving people CDs so you can listen to them, you want the listener to like it, and the average music listener isn't going to pick apart your doubled tracks, or notice your recording has keys and strings, but WAIT! They don't have a string section or a keyboard! The average person listens to the vocals anyway.
They don't necesarilly sound out of sync unless you solo just the guitars for a listen. But part of what makes the sound are those minor fluctuations between performances. You barely hear them unless they're done badly or intentionally.I record pretty casually and have never doubled guitar tracks. I've always avoided since I've seen people do it with vocals and the final product being really cheesy and out of sync.
I might have to give this a try though. Do you guys usually EQ each of the doubled tracks differently?