Does Software affect Quality

  • Thread starter Thread starter JMB
  • Start date Start date
J

JMB

New member
I am just wanting to know if software makes a difference in the recording quality. Does it make a difference if I use Pro Tools, NTrack or windows Sound recorder. (I know better that to record and edit with sound recorder, just want a contrast ;) .) I have some experince with Pro Tools at work but am not sure if it is safe to use something lesser. :eek:

Thanks in advance

Jeffrey
 
The quality is going to depend more on your mics, pre-amps, and bit rate & sample rate of your A/D converter than the software you use. ProTools may be the "industry standard" but other programs are starting to give it a run for its money.
 
In addition to the front-end signal chain, the sound source, the A/D converters and the players themselves, the s/w can make a huge difference, depending on the calibre of the programming involved in carrying-out the DSP algorithms.....
 
Once it's in the computer, everything stays pristine.

Doesn't matter what program you use.
 
TimOBrien said:
Once it's in the computer, everything stays pristine.

Doesn't matter what program you use.
Not so - as I pointed out - a program using badly implemented algorithms can butcher the sound quality.........
 
I did a test. I mixed the exact same thing in Nuendo, Protools, and samplitude. 16 tracks, nothing but panning and volume. None of them sounded the same, they all do something slightly different. It wasn't a giant difference, but I think anyone could hear it when a/b/c 'ed
 
Err, did you mention using Windows sound recorder?

Yeah, don't use that...

From what I've noticed, it does seem like each program adds its own little sound to the mix, depending on the algorithms used like Far and Bear mentioned. Basically, stick with the high-end stuff whenever possible; a cheap program will cheapen your sound. Also, multiple conversions/encodings can add artifacts and other things, so yeah, I'd just keep it in Pro Tools if that's what you're good with.
 
Thanks But...

Ok, thanks guys for all of your input.
I understand how mixing and editing can effect the sound. But I am wanting to know more about simply recording. While you are recording does the software handle the sound input (thereby effecting the quality :mad: ) and write it to the hard drive or does the software just tell the Hardware to record and it all sounds the same no matter what the software?

The reason that I want to know is because I am thinking about doing some recording at home with less expensive software and equipment and then bringing it to work to the the mixing with Pro Tools.

Thanks again,
Jeffrey
 
IN order of importance, here is the list of areas that will affect the quality of the recording on the way TO the digital recorder (PC or otherwise)...

1) the players themselves

2) the room they're playing in

3) the mic selection to capture the sound of the player in the room they're playing in

4) the mic pre - which colors (favourably or unfavourably) the mic used to capture the sound of the player in the room they're playing in

5) the A/D converter - which converts the analog signal to digital -- get the sound wrong at this point by using cheap converters, and the digital quality will be diminished a great deal

If you get all these steps right, then you'll have a very good digital representation of the sound you fed into the recorder. At this point, the digital audio is uncorrupt and will remain so as long as you don't overwrite it.

S/W generally works non-destructively on audio files unless you intentionally overwrite changes.

If you now load that sound file into a poorly written piece of s/w that doesn't handle DSP operations properly, you'll probably find that the sound differs from what you heard playing back the original file.

By contrast, if you take your digital file and load it into quality s/w, edit and manipulate it, you should notice far less change or deterioration (if any) to the end result.
 
Blue Bear Sound said:
IN order of importance, here is the list of areas that will affect the quality of the recording on the way TO the digital recorder (PC or otherwise)...

[edit]1) The Instrument[/edit]

2) The players themselves

3) The room they're playing in

4) The mic selection to capture the sound of the player in the room they're playing in

5) the mic pre - which colors (favourably or unfavourably) the mic used to capture the sound of the player in the room they're playing in

6) the A/D converter - which converts the analog signal to digital -- get the sound wrong at this point by using cheap converters, and the digital quality will be diminished a great deal.

[edit]Cables and digital clocking are what ties it together. Crappy cables and clocks are often overlooked until the last moment when everything you spent gobs of money on, and your recordings still sounds like a Radio Shack infomercial.[/edit]

If you get all these steps right, then you'll have a very good digital representation of the sound you fed into the recorder. At this point, the digital audio is uncorrupt and will remain so as long as you don't overwrite it.

S/W generally works non-destructively on audio files unless you intentionally overwrite changes.

If you now load that sound file into a poorly written piece of s/w that doesn't handle DSP operations properly, you'll probably find that the sound differs from what you heard playing back the original file.

By contrast, if you take your digital file and load it into quality s/w, edit and manipulate it, you should notice far less change or deterioration (if any) to the end result.

:D

SoMm
 
ok ok... so I didn't feel the need to fill-in the very obvious stuff!!! ;)
 
This has been an ongoing debate over on the Cakewalk forum for quite some time.

Theoretically, once it's inside the computer, the data should all sound the same unless the program is applying some kind of DSP internally.

I've never A/B'd any of the different programs to see if that's the case, but I've certainly read a lot of threads where people insist they sound different even though the files, when inverted and mixed, cancel each other out completely. I can't explain that.

Overall, it would seem that ANY of the major audio programs (and some of the less major ones as well), are capable of producing excellent quality recordings. Considering all of the many variables we deal with, the sound quality of the software would seem to be one of the least important.

What IS important as far as the software goes anyway, is how well a particular program works with you. Is it intuitive? Does it allow you to accomplish what you want with a minimum of fuss? Does it inhibit or enhance your workflow? Do you look forward to working with it? Is it reliable?

To put it all in perspective, 40 years ago multitrack recorders didn't exist, yet engineers were making great sounding mixes we still listen to today.

We have amazing tools available for absurdly low prices. If you can't make music with any one of them, then the problem isn't with the technology.

Ted
 
Back
Top