direct electric guitar

  • Thread starter Thread starter cello_pudding
  • Start date Start date
C

cello_pudding

Well-known member
the search is failing me right now, so i'm sorry if this is a huge subject.

I'm trying to help this guy on another board, and i'm not having success.

he has an maudio usb as his preamp. he records direct and dislikes the tone. he says he needs a new interface, and i keep telling him it's not his interface. I suggested a mic since an "upgrade" from a $150 interface will be more than the cost of a 57 and an e609 combined.

he tells me he doesn't want to mic. i suggest a pod, behr vamp, or boss gt3. he dislikes the pod tone. he has a nice peavey 5605 head with an orange cab. he tours for months and writes on the road with a laptop. i suggested recording direct and then reamping once he gets home. he doesn't want to do the cheap and amazing tone way.

i suggested a tube power amp, direct out of the head and i'm going to give up.

he's basically asking how to get a huge sound recording direct and listening back on his headphones.

i giggled in his general direction.
 
Last edited:
Some people can't be reasoned with. You might tell him to check out the Damage Control stuff if he doesn't like the POD.
 
Let's see...

He doesn't like direct.

He doesn't like amp modeling.

He doesn't like reamping.

he doen't like miking the amp.

Sounds to me like the problem just might be the ear and not the gear. The solution might just be replacing himself.

G.
 
Yup, he is the problem. Trying to get a huge tone just for getting ideas down is a little stupid too. No matter how you go about it, it's going to be too much work to set up...and then the idea is gone.

He has backed himself into a corner that only he can get out of. He is expecting top studio quality in a motel room, he's insane.
 
thing is...he's heard "many direct to computer recordings that come out sounding really well"
 
cello_pudding said:
thing is...he's heard "many direct to computer recordings that come out sounding really well"
Then it must be him.


How were those recordings done? Maybe he should try that.
 
Ive never had a problem with going direct into Guitar Rig... You cant really fault it... and even using the crappiest amps and mics ive also got some great guitar sounds..

this guy sounds like a very unexperimental person
 
yeah the problem is definately his ear, then. You can get a good tone out of direct recording with software (just a little harder to do). The thing he needs to know is that there are many ways to do things, and not to rule any way out that has given people good results.... micing is great when done right, direct when done right can sound great... pods sound just fine, and re-amping is one of the best ideas out there. I totally agree with farview...You can't concentrate on the tone and mix when you're getting ideas down... you'll just end up losing all your ideas, and really the way the music is written can give you a bigger tone sometimes even more than your technique... there are just some people that will never have a certain tone no matter what they do, because of how they play, their guitar, or the way the song is arranged.
 
technominds said:
Ive never had a problem with going direct into Guitar Rig... You cant really fault it... and even using the crappiest amps and mics ive also got some great guitar sounds..

this guy sounds like a very unexperimental person


YUP! the player matters way more than the gear or method! But, fuck..there's big bucks in tricking people into thinking their piece of gear will turn them into randy rhodes. Experimentation is essential sometimes! :)
 
Tell him to learn about convolution reverb, it's the next best thing to reamping.
 
Another *very* important factor is the guitar/pickups. I didn't realize this before when just using a crappy Epiphone guitar direct, sounded like shit. Then I tried a Yamaha/Strat copy and I think it just sounds much better direct than the other one. For clean tones anyway. Not nearly as much of that 'fuzzy'/extremely digital/fake' sound. I can only imagine what a really nice guitar with nice pickups sounds like. Still not as good as a nice amp of course.

For heavy stuff I would definitely use an amp. Maybe some good guitars/guitar players/great amp sims/good engineers could get it right, but for heavy distortion I would personally use a decent mic and a great sounding amp.

If he doesn't understand that then it's his loss.
 
I saw a TV commercial where some guy got a pretty good sound going through a Volkswagon car stereo. Might be just the ticket for this guy!
 
omtayslick said:
I saw a TV commercial where some guy got a pretty good sound going through a Volkswagon car stereo. Might be just the ticket for this guy!
:D. And being able to play like Slash would be a help too. That guy is into far more than just shredding; he knows his musicianship.

G.
 
first off, +1 to the "it's him" diagnosis. i'm glad someone said it, b/c that's the first thing that went through my mind too.......b/c been there, been that guy. he's fscked until he can deal with it, and that's the only way that can be fixed. that said, i can understand wanting or needing to DI the guitar. i agree that it's not ideal (i too prefer miking an amp), but we often have to deal with and make the most of it. here's a couple things i've found useful when recording DI guitar:

1. some guitars just don't sound that great DI'd. pickups and electronics do make a difference.
2. make sure to match up the pickups with the proper DI. passive pups need an active DI and vice-versa.
3. a decent DI is essential--i love my countryman. lots of good things are said about the radial ones too.
4. running the DI into different sounding mic pres can really help sculpt the tone.

i've found modellers to be fun to get neat tones out of, but i've never been able to get them to work in a mix and sound "real enough" to work with "real" (non-triggered/sample replaced) drums. that's not to say that some folks don't use them to great success.

i've gotten some excellent clean strat/tele tones out of my strat/tels->countryman->minime. the soft-limit compression on the minime really helps get the sound nice and fat and spanky. i've never had much success with DI'd overdriven sounds, though. to me, they just don't seem to have the same kind of heft an amp has.

good luck to him and his quest!


cheers,
wade
 
SouthSIDE Glen said:
Let's see...

He doesn't like direct.

He doesn't like amp modeling.

He doesn't like reamping.

he doesn't like miking the amp.


Ha!
He obviously just hates the sound of guitars and cant deal with the fact that hes put time and effort into learning it. He's in denial!

On a different note Plugs can sound great on clean guitars, but on heavy guitars amps just work better.
Also need to make sure its DI or Hi-Z as opposed to line-in or you'll loose the higher frequency's
Last thing to try is amp head into speaker simulator into input mic pre. but thats gonna be costly and he will probably still hate it any way. mind its an excuse to buy new gear which is what he seems to want to do any way :D
 
...

cello_pudding said:
he's basically asking how to get a huge sound recording direct and listening back on his headphones.

both the jcm900 plug in and the soldano plug in clones are nice.

the jcm900 coupled with the SIR plug-in and a mesa cab sim impulse is huge enough for his application. of course, like when he goes in the studio (he tours and I assume has gone into a studio, so he must know this) he'll need to record at least 4 rhythm guitars to really sound big.

here's the soldano: http://www.bteaudio.com/software/Juicy77/Juicy77.html

I don't have the jcm900 quick-linked.

If plug-ins, a pod-like device, or a sansamp-like device don't float his boat, he needs to stop trying to record himself or learn how to record.
 
Which 900 Plug? theres loads of them and i'll bet they all sound different!

i'll also bet its a VST :(
 
guitar

im tired of hearing huge guitar sounds. tell your friend weve already heard enough guitar and we want to hear a new idea.
 
Back
Top