I don't know. I feel too much is also apt here. It seems like many people reach straight for a compressor when they aren't even sure if it's the right tool for the job. After all, that's all it is...a tool.
In many cases a compressor will serve to eliminate dynamics, punch and impact and that is exactly what is missing from most music produced in these modern times, especially in unsure hands.
Also, I think saying "compression is good" is a bit of a broad statement that I struggle to find meaning with because everything is completely subjective in audio. There's no reference. Good as opposed to what? No compression? I feel that statement kind of implies, "it's good to use compression on everything, as long as you know what you're doing", whereas, I would merely say, "compression
can be good if you know what you're doing, and it can also be bad". You will never know until you hear the production and decide it's the best thing for the job. But even then you have to decide what your goals are there. Transient suppression? Transient enhancement? More sustain? Reduced dynamic range? Character driven? To supply an effect?
So yeah, I agree compression can be a wonderful thing if done right, but it's definitely over rated, particularly when you work with competent performers.
Cheers
