
mark4man
MoonMix Studios
Man...
Somebody please kick my ragged ass !!!
Got my KRK Rockit8's about 6 months ago; & fed them (for some reason) with unbalanced RCA lines (1/4" TS > Coax.) Right away I thought they were kinda' on the LOUD side...had to set the hardware outs on my AI (Echo Audio Layla 24/96) nominally to -10dBv; & pull the output level down to -12dB (all the while setting the volume on the KRK's to -30dB...the bottom of the scale.)
Posted in a couple of gear forums; & other guys said: "yeah...I do that"...so I continued on my merry way.
Today I went out & got balanced lines & hooked them up.
The volume is not NEAR as loud.
The sound has more clarity, depth & openness (I've actually come to hate that term..."openness"...incidentally.)
Anyway...they sound 100% better !!!
So, with this being the case...why do they even outfit active systems with unbalanced hookups?
I AM doing it correctly now, right...this IS the way active nearfields were intended to be used, correct ??? It sounds so much better...it's gotta' be right.
Anybody have any thoughts on this (on KRK's or just in general)...did I discover something or just wake up?
Thanks,
mark4man
Somebody please kick my ragged ass !!!
Got my KRK Rockit8's about 6 months ago; & fed them (for some reason) with unbalanced RCA lines (1/4" TS > Coax.) Right away I thought they were kinda' on the LOUD side...had to set the hardware outs on my AI (Echo Audio Layla 24/96) nominally to -10dBv; & pull the output level down to -12dB (all the while setting the volume on the KRK's to -30dB...the bottom of the scale.)
Posted in a couple of gear forums; & other guys said: "yeah...I do that"...so I continued on my merry way.
Today I went out & got balanced lines & hooked them up.
The volume is not NEAR as loud.
The sound has more clarity, depth & openness (I've actually come to hate that term..."openness"...incidentally.)
Anyway...they sound 100% better !!!
So, with this being the case...why do they even outfit active systems with unbalanced hookups?
I AM doing it correctly now, right...this IS the way active nearfields were intended to be used, correct ??? It sounds so much better...it's gotta' be right.
Anybody have any thoughts on this (on KRK's or just in general)...did I discover something or just wake up?
Thanks,
mark4man