Compare AT4060, NTK, SolidTube

  • Thread starter Thread starter bgavin
  • Start date Start date
B

bgavin

New member
Does anybody have any direct comparison experience with the AT4060 as compared to the Rode NTK or AKG SolidTube?

I'm curious about thick 'n juicy vocals in this price range LDC.
 
No, I don't.


But if I had my choice, I'd grab the 4060.

I don't know of many fans of the Solid Tube.
 
New street price on the AT4060 appears to be $1000, compared to $500 for the NTK, and $1600 for the Rode Classic-II. The AKG SolidTube is around $700.

The NTK is universally well received, and certainly priced within reason for the duffer recordist. I'm curious if the AT4060 is 2x the lush sound for 2x the price.
 
I have a lot of experience with my AT4060 and I just love it...get that one and forget the Solid Tube (no comparison). This 4060 has one big, fat & luscious sound.
 
Is there enough difference between your AT4060 and AT4047 to warrant having both?
 
the at4047 is a serious mic. side by side, i prefer it to the soundelux u195 for whatever that's worth. they sound quite similar in any case, and at least on my voice, the 4047 has a slight edge.

i'm also curious how the 4047 stacks up to the 4060.

b.t.w., if yur interested, i also bought a rode ntk. it didn't work on my voice, but i didn't return it before my 30 days were up, so i have one with a shockmount and hardcase for sale.
pm me if you're interested.

it's barely used and i'm going to put it on e-bay in a day or two if no one here wants it.
cheers,
d
 
I'm a very happy NTK owner, and would highly recommend that mic. Solid Tube hasn't generated a lot of fans. 4060 is probably awesome, and has generated many accolades.
Any chance you can try them out? I'm guessing the NTK has a little more sheen than the 4060, with the 4060 probably having a "bigger" sound. One or the other is more likely to fit a particular voice.
RD
 
Hi bgavin,

The AT4047SV & AT4060 are completely different microphones and because of this they add more sonic flavors to the microphone locker. The AT4047 is quite close to an early FET mic while the AT4060 is an all tube model. Both are cardioid only and both sound amazing. In my own opinion (and also many folks that post here) you can never have enough mics within arm's reach! I have 12 personally and the collection is going in only one direction...UP! This is a nasty addiction but I have embraced it & now love it all the more. :D
 
Last edited:
I have an AT4040 that is bright and pretty neutral in coloration.

My thoughts are about a phat, juicy LDC for vocals that don't work with the AT4040.

Sure, I'd like to own both the AT4047 and AT4060. And a pair of KSM44 and two C480B, also. I currently have a posse of SM57, SM58, ATM25, and a single AT4040 which needs a twin brother.
 
The Solidtube is a much maligned beast. It comes with an internal pop filter. Removing it does wonders. I use NTK and I have used Solidtube extensively. They are both very good mics at the price point. They are both pretty easy to find for about $500. I could not think of 2 mics more different that use similar designs for similar purposes. The Solidtube is smooth and dark, and really likes a loud source, which will bring out its color. Put it in front of a woman belter with a bright or strident voice and it will rock. A mic for Linda Rondstadt. NTK is a lot brighter, and requires less SPL's to create its color. A very versatile vocal mic that is good on guitars. I think the 4060 is not as bright as NTK, or as dark as Solidtube, and is is less colored than NTK. As I said, how much color you get out of Solidtube depends on the SPLs. When you remove the internal pop filter, the mic becomes a little more sensitive, also, and the color kicks in at a lower volume level.
I think the 4060 is a better quality mic than either of the others, and it is about twice the price. If you can afford it, go for it. But I would also say that the Solidtube is an underated mic that most people don't know how to use.-Richie
 
Back
Top