Chords that go together

  • Thread starter Thread starter Slouching Raymond
  • Start date Start date
Slouching Raymond

Slouching Raymond

Well-known member
Of late I've been picking away on my steel acoustic guitar, trying to make up chords.
They all have names, but I don't really care what they're called.
In particular I've been exploring what you can do with just two fingers.
Making easy shapes on the fretboard, moving them around.
Just arpeggio them, and it sounds very pleasant.
Often music that sounds complex, and looks complex when written on a score, is actually just simple finger movements on an instrument.
So I'm trying to start out with simple finger movements, and see where it takes me.

Also, looking at keyboards, and what chords go with each other.
The left hand side of a 'Circle Of Fifths', is just a mirror image of the right hand side.
To this end, I have sussed that mirror images of chords go well together.
Take a D Major triad on a keyboard, look at it through a mirror, and you see a G Minor triad.
Therefor D Major and G Minor should go well together, and they do.
Any other observations?
 
This question is basically all of music theory in a nutshell, right? "What harmonies sound good together?"

It's really all some form of tension and resolution, if you want to simplify it as far as possible. The circle of 5ths is basically a bunch of V-I resolutions stacked on top of each other: In C, you have a C major triad of C-E-G, with a B if you want to include the major 7th, and a G7 triad of G-B-D, with an F if you include the 7th (which for the sake of nailing down why this sounds good you probably should) So, you've got a couple pitches that are constant between the two chords - the G doesn't change since it's the root of your V7 and the 5th of your I, and then if you include your major 7th, the B is a common pitch as well, the 3rd of your V7, and the maj7 of your I. Then, you have two pitches that do move, in opposite directions - the 7 of G, an F, drops a half step to the E in your C chord, while at the same time the 5th of G7, a D, drops a full step to the root of your C. This half and whole step resolution to the tonic is an incredibly powerful sounding resolution and sounds very "final" to your ear.

...final enough, in fact, that you can next treat your tonic as the new V chord, and resolve to another I below it, here, C to F. This is your circle of 5ths.

The "why" though is kind of telling and points to another great way to connect chords - when you go from G to C, and then C to F, and then F to Bb... really what you're doing is G7 to Cmaj7 to C7 to Fmaj7 to F7 to Bmaj7, and there's a chromatic resolution in there that's implied by the harmony even if it isn't actually happening. The B in Cmaj7 drops s semitone down to a Bb, yielding a C7, which then falls another semitone to the A in Fmaj7, while the E in FMaj7 then drops a semitone to Eb, in F7, which falls another half step to D in Bbmaj7. So, what's compelling about this to your ear is that a half step movement in an environment with a lot of other pitches held constant can ALSO sound really consonant to your ear, even when you're technically stepping out of key (I skipped over this, but you're familiar with the harmonized triads from a major scale, right? I, ii, iii, IV, V, vi, viib5, and I? with upper case major and lower case minor?). This kind of resolution can be a lot of fun - in the key of A, for example, try playing a I-IV-V-I in A to really get your head grounded in the harmony, then play A-D-Dm-A. There you have the major 3rd of D becoming a minor 3rd of D minor, then becoming the 5th of A, as a three-note chromatic descent, that links a chord that has no business at all being played in A major, a Dm, into the key (I'm using this as an example because I used this exact move as the resolution for a song of mine once, and thought it was pretty cool).

This is just the tip of the iceberg and to go much deeper I'd want a guitar in hand, but thinking about how chords resolve from one to the next, less because they're a product of a certain scale, and more because of what the resolutions within those chords are, can yield some pretty cool ideas.

If you want some fresh ideas on how to link chords like this, grab a good fake book, with "The Real Book" being the gold standard - sitting down with one and your instrument of choice (here, a guitar) and just sort of strumming through the changes, and unpacking how each chord is resolving to the next can give you some ideas on how to approach non-diatonic harmony in your own writing. And I say this as a shred/rock/blues player and absolutely NOT a jazz cat - harmonic movement is a lot of fun, and what we call jazz today used to just be people doing pop standards and trading solos over them, and you don't even have to use particularly complex chords to take lessons from here (the solo section for one of my songs I'm just wrapping up is straight major chords, but with an implied chromatic descending line stringing them together and linking two distinct tonal sections, which for kicks I ultimately ended up adding a sort of funky strummed/muted rhythm guitar playing a tight chromatic descending octave figure in as a background part under the lead to really bring that out).
 
Last edited:
I've been knocking out some 70's songs from the carpenters - I got a music book and kept looking at the notes and the chords and thinking 'what?'. Really weird chords with less common notes in the bass - like Eb as the chord, with an F in the bass? Or Gb aug 5th - until you actually play them and they just sound right and amazing. chords are magic things! The strange thing is where you move just one note in a chord and it's like a journey with a big signpost as to where you are going - like putting clues in the music. If you like songs with unusual chords - check out Gilbert O'Sullivan from the 70s - alone again, naturally. Some really great chord journeys to places you don't expect.
 
That's a good post Drew, and an education in itself.
I'm going to work through it with an instrument.
I've always thought theory gets a bad rap - "theory is rules, and music shouldn't have rules!"

I don't think that's the case at all. Theory is a toolkit. It helps solve problems by explaining why going from one harmony/chord to another sounds good, and gives you approaches you can leverage that suggest different ways to make things sound good.

If you understand how chords are built out of scales from triads (EG - a C major chord is the first and third and fifth degree of a C major scale - C D E F G etc) and you know your chord tones, then sitting down with a chord progression you like and working through it chord tone by chord tone and trying to see why it sounds good, can be a really cool exercise and can give you some ideas for your own writing.
 
I've been using a program called Scaler. Pretty good tool. It has been helping to better understand keys, chords in the scale, number sequence, etc. It really has helped me become better educated to the theory. It also has a tab section so I can convert the chords to the guitar. It is also helping me to better understand the keyboard and how to perform chords.


For the last year or so, I have been play with different keys, Mainly the flats, I really like working with the flats. And if I want to change keys, which I don't have the background to fully know how, it shows me the path. I have even played with going three-four key shift. It really has been a great learning tool. Now, I assume it is used for other reasons, but for me, it provides me a way to understand what I was doing, what I am going to do. What is really nice, I can get the song arranged a plotted out, and if I leave the song for several months, then come back it is there as if I had written it down. I can't always remembered what I was playing around with after a couple of months.

Not a bad price either for what it provides. For an amateur like me, it gives me access to the experts.
 
A pro banjo player once showed me a technique he called "string swapping" to find passing chords between normal chord changes. It related well to guitar.
Take any two fretted adjacent strings and swap their string and fret position. For instance when leaving a normal C chord , play the "a" string on the 2nd fret and the "d" string on the 3rd. fret. Just about any chord you do this with gives some pretty interesting results. The examples he showed me were pretty amazing with an extra "flurry" of notes on both banjo and guitar. He normally wins or places high in the bluegrass competitions around my area.
 
Chord progressions are three or four melodies on a journey that like each other. Each one has a beginning and end, and on the way, they create new chords that are a meeting point, a passing point, or a pothole for one or other.
 
Frequently on bass, I play the chord's 7th in place of the 5th and vice versa. Sometimes the 5th is the dissonant one in the composition.
 
Only happens occasionally when the guy on rhythm guitar gets a little fancy with a chord change. Most times either one will work.
 
5th not 7th and not always just when the rhythm player I was playing with would throw in a slightly different chord structure as he was moving between chords. The 5th would sound awkward. Most times he would make a clean transition without trying to squeeze another chord in between then either 5th or 7th would sound fine I would just pick the one that felt best according to my mood at the time.
 
Back
Top