RAMI said:
Thanx Fairview...There's an another option that will end up much chepaer in the long run. Would the quality look as good as the company Glen sent me??? I don't want to save money if it's going to have a "home-made" quality to it. Looks tempting as hell, though.
No, they are two different types of things entirely.
Ink jet printers like the Epson do a fairly decent job, but they require special printible-surface CD-Rs and they are still using only ink-jet ink; not the most durable finish. Not bad, but definitely not the same quality. Mixonic uses a pro CNC-style silk screening machine with PMS 5-color
paint, not ink. It's the exact same process used to print commercial CDs/DVDs. You won't see a difference now or 5 years from now.
Plus, if you gotta make more than just a handful of copies, the cost in time and replacement cartriges wind up making it cost savings rather academic.
For example, if you wanted to run off 100 full-color CDs, no jewel case, no sleeves, just the discs, it'll cost you $178 ($1.78 per disc) for the silk screen at Mixonic.
Ink jet cartriges for the R220 (itself a one-time investment of $100) will cost on the order of about $40 or so for the 6-color 6-pack or $9.95 for a single-color replacement. Add in a 100-pack of Mitsui printable CD-Rs for about $74 ($0.74 each). So the first 100-disc run with printer purchase will cost you about $214 (pretax). After that, assuming one 6-pack ink cartrige refill on average for 100 full-color discs (depending upon image style), you're talking about $114 for a 100-run ($1.14) per disc.
So the difference from $1.14/disc to $1.78/disc will move you from ink jet ink to silk screen paint, will let someone else do the work for you in just a couple of days versus having to sit there and pump 100 CDs through a printer yourself. And then there's the maintenance; monitoring the ink usage and replacement, and keeping the ink nozzles clean. And if you're doing it just once, the cost of the printer itself makes the ink jet job actually
more expensive.
Your call as to whether it's worth the extra 64 cents per disc on average to go to the silk screen. It depends upon the job, I guess. But for a client, I won't go any less than a silk screen job; they are just too impressed with the results. And it saves me huge costs in time. And is sometimes actually faster turnaround than if I were to do it myself; if the artwork is more or less ready, I can submit the job before I actually start mixing the audio. By the time the master files are ready I can have the discs back from the printer and ready to burn (or I can have them burn them for me.)
G.