L
Lingo
New member
I wonder if a Fostex MR8 would be adequate for a very specific need I have -- to produce clean wav files of spoken voice with great audio quality. I appreciate any feedback people here could give. (I'm also posting similar questions in other relevant forums (e.g. about the Boss 864, etc.)
I'm involved in a project to produce foreign language learning CDs. Just mono voice with no singing or music at all. I tried using an MAudio Duo w/ my laptop, but would get occasional slight popping sounds. I defragged my laptop prior to recording, but I figure there's too many variables to potentially control to get the Duo-laptop approach to work well enough. Plus I want to avoid buying a new computer or second HD for audio files, if possible.
I wouldn't use the MR8 for effects or editing, other than to adjust EQ. But I will do *a lot* of copying and moving voice clips around in the PC later with editing software, because language phrases will be repeated at different intervals to help students' learning.
I'm thinking perhaps if I record directly into a digital recorder and then transfer the wav files to my PC separately, I can avoid all chance of popping sounds or other problems. (Is this true, or could audio quality problems occur in the digital recorder, or in my PC simply by copying/pasting/moving voice snippets?)
BTW, I have a Sure SM58 mike.
I'd like to minimize cost and learning needs, (since I'm pretty much a rank newbie in the world of digital recording). I only need a single mono track and can transfer to PC frequently so the CF memory limitations aren't too big a deal, yet I would buy a 256 or 512MB card in addition to the MR8.
If I can record off of batteries only, I'd prefer it. But if sound quality wouldn't be adequate, I can go w/ a hard-drive based recorder, or even a used zip-disk or mini-disk recorder.
What do ya'll think? Is 16 bit 44.1khz adequate? Would the MR8 capture clear, nice-sounding spoken voices, or should I spend more for a Boss 864, or a HD-based system, or is there still a strong argument to stick w/ the Maudio Duo direct recording to my laptop?
Thanks for considering this.
I'm involved in a project to produce foreign language learning CDs. Just mono voice with no singing or music at all. I tried using an MAudio Duo w/ my laptop, but would get occasional slight popping sounds. I defragged my laptop prior to recording, but I figure there's too many variables to potentially control to get the Duo-laptop approach to work well enough. Plus I want to avoid buying a new computer or second HD for audio files, if possible.
I wouldn't use the MR8 for effects or editing, other than to adjust EQ. But I will do *a lot* of copying and moving voice clips around in the PC later with editing software, because language phrases will be repeated at different intervals to help students' learning.
I'm thinking perhaps if I record directly into a digital recorder and then transfer the wav files to my PC separately, I can avoid all chance of popping sounds or other problems. (Is this true, or could audio quality problems occur in the digital recorder, or in my PC simply by copying/pasting/moving voice snippets?)
BTW, I have a Sure SM58 mike.
I'd like to minimize cost and learning needs, (since I'm pretty much a rank newbie in the world of digital recording). I only need a single mono track and can transfer to PC frequently so the CF memory limitations aren't too big a deal, yet I would buy a 256 or 512MB card in addition to the MR8.
If I can record off of batteries only, I'd prefer it. But if sound quality wouldn't be adequate, I can go w/ a hard-drive based recorder, or even a used zip-disk or mini-disk recorder.
What do ya'll think? Is 16 bit 44.1khz adequate? Would the MR8 capture clear, nice-sounding spoken voices, or should I spend more for a Boss 864, or a HD-based system, or is there still a strong argument to stick w/ the Maudio Duo direct recording to my laptop?
Thanks for considering this.