
kidvybes
New member
I see that GAP get a lot of recs, but if people like it, it's not because of 80dB gain. Gain is cheap, what is important is noise performance. So I imagine the GAP is low noise (although I can't find its specification). Plus I think people dig its transformers . . .
I mean, if you had a preamp with a bad noise spec, say EIN of -100dBV, then 80dB of gain would get you noise of -20dBV. Not particularly useful . . .
Another way to think about gain and noise is to consider that the quietest possible pre is roughly -130dBV, plus 80dB is -50dBV of noise. If you are using a very low sensitivity mic, say -60dBV/Pa, and recording a 74dBSPL source (I sincerely hope nobody would use a mic that low on a source that low), you have signal of -80dBV and dynamic range of only 50dB with your -130dBV EIN pre. No amount of gain can ever change that.
...good points...I have A/B'd the GAP with my vintage/rebuilt Neve 1290 (same circuit layout) and the difference in noise floor is very evident even without doing any technical measurements...the GAP is noticeably quieter and retains enough "Neve-type" tone to make this pre a real bargain...highly recommended...

Out of the mics Id pick the shure [SM7] of course....its the only one listed that Ive ever seen someone with a record deal using...
...the KEL HM-2d is surprisingly similar sounding to the SM7 and fits well within the OP's budget...I've actually comped vocal takes using the HM-2d and one of my SM7's, and with a drop of EQ, the files blended excellently...great little mic for cheap...