http://mixonline.com/mag/audio_snapshot_product_reviews_23/
01/2005
WHARFEDALE DIAMOND PRO 8.2
Studio MOnitors
Wharfedale's Diamond Series consumer speakers have been around since 1981. A couple of years back, I tried a pair and found them perfectly acceptable as small studio monitors. Now, the new pro division of this 72-year-old British company ups the ante with the Diamond Pro Series, offered as passive or powered versions for studio near-field applications.
I checked out the 8.2 Pro, which combines a front-ported enclosure with 6.5-inch Kevlar woofer, 1-inch soft-dome neodymium tweeter and 100 watts (60W LF, 40W HF) of onboard bi-amping. The gray-finish cabinet is 14.3×8.4×12.7 inches (H×W×D) and the shaped front baffle should serve to reduce diffraction effects. The monitors ship with removable grilles that should be stored with the packing materials. Response is spec'd at 45 to 24k Hz; max SPL at 1 meter is 108 dB.
The rear panel has a bass roll-off switch, volume pot, AC switch and IEC cable connection, and a large amplifier heat sink to keep thermals in check. I don't like variable pots — I'd prefer a switched gain control for matching the gain between the two sides. You could always turn them up to “10” and back off the gain beforehand, but these slightly overamped monitors put out plenty of SPLs when set at “3” and driven by a -10dB signal. Turning them up higher than this serves no purpose other than waking the dead.
I liked the balanced Neutrik Combo TRS/XLR and unbalanced RCA inputs — you never know what you'll find at a studio these days. Another nice touch is the mag shielding — it's less of an issue as more users turn to flat-panel displays, but there are still a lot of CRTs out there.
The speakers sounded fine out of the box and didn't require bass tweaking — a good thing, as the Bass Filter control was too extreme for acoustic tailoring. I found these to be comfortable and nonfatiguing, providing a linear, consistent response that translated well. I perhaps wanted a bit more “air band” (15 kHz), but overall, the HF response is natural, the mids were right where they should be and the LF was a true picture of the bottom end. The stereo imaging was nice with a solid phantom center and uncolored off-axis sound. Best of all, they retail at $399/pair — a bargain!
— George Petersen
You can also read this from another forum about the wharfi´s:
http://recforums.prosoundweb.com/index.php/m/43872/0#msg_43872
"The active 8.2's are a little better. Here's everything I know about them:
A Chinese company bought the rights to the Wharfedale name; the speakers are still designed in England, but made in China. The power amp was designed by a friend of mine in L.A., and he's one of the best amp designers around.
The passive 8,2 have a low midrange bump around 600 to 800Hz, which makes them a little "woofy" sounding, but still very usable. They go down pretty damn low and the imaging is amazing. Unlike many nearfields I've heard, I don't think I would have any problems doing a final mix on them, if they were all I had.
The active 8.2A's have some smoothing, lowering the upper 800Hz bump to where it's a little flatter than the passives.
They're a hell of a deal, and they work amazingly well for their intended purpose. Other than the low midrange bumps, I haven't heard any "Gotcha's" in this system. "