broadcast wave or riff wave?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mojew
  • Start date Start date
mojew

mojew

New member
i just noticed that you can choose to mix down as a broadcast wave or a riff wave. whats the difference, and which one should i be using?
 
Hi Mojew,

Broadcast wav can be used if you want to transfer your Sonar project to a different sequencing program like ProTools. For all other exporting purposes (like burning to CD) just use the Riff wav format.

Best regards,
Scott

--
Scott R. Garrigus - Author of Cakewalk, Sound Forge and Sound Forge 6, SONAR and SONAR 2 Power! books; Publisher of DigiFreq. Win a free copy of PowerFX's Dyad DXi software synth and learn more cool music technology tips and techniques by getting a FREE subscription to DigiFreq... over 14,000 readers can't be wrong! Go to:
http://www.digifreq.com/digifreq/
 
is there an actual sound difference though? i mixed a project down in both formats and they sounded different to me, although i can't really tell which i like better.
 
Mr. Garrigus had general hint :) You may want to export as Riff Wave format usualy :)

Riff : Resource Interchange File Format

The difference you hear might be caused by different "encoder algorithm" being used to export them :) I never really hear the differences, but in rare case, you may hear it slightly.

...can you explain in plain English, Jaymz ?

Hmmm... how about this... right click, and save this target (.pdf format)...


;)
Jaymz

ps. I assume you have Adobe Acrobat Reader to open the document :)
 
okay. the more i listened to them more closely and they really sound like completely different mixes. i like the broadcast wave better. i think i'll be using that from now on.
 
mojew,

There's no difference in the way the two sound (or at least, there shouldn't be.) The audio data is not altered in the rendering of a BWF. The only difference is the addition of one chunk of metadata, changing only the extension of the file, for the purpose of platform recognition.

Listen again...is there really a discernable difference?

mark4man
 
yes. i'm 100% sure there is an audible difference. i'll post the two waves tomorrow if i get a chance.
 
Do normal media players play broadcast wavs? And what about burning to CD -- can you use a broadcast wav as a source file?
 
I thought that a Broadcast Wave could be played in any player, the player would just not read the extra information...
 
moskus said:
I thought that a Broadcast Wave could be played in any player, the player would just not read the extra information...
Click to expand...

I thought there were extra codecs required, "Please wait while Microsoft Media Player installs new codecs", but it should be as per Moskus................ (der!!!!!)

Cya,

:) Q.
 
I just tested it: Windows Media Player and Winamp just plays it. Nothing extra-ordinary happens... ;)
 
Bows down and once again worships the Moskus-man........

:) Q.

(What OS - was it clean? I used 95a with the installed WMP 6)
 
Yeah...

...& I owe an apology to mojew. I bounced a composition to stereo wav in both formats...& there is a sonic difference!

That is strange.

mark4man

BTW - Burnt them both to CD; & listened to them both in various media players...without a hitch.
 
yeah. like. to me it sounds like a completely different mix.

what do people like better?
 
this is a rather interesting thread... does the 'sonic' differences come in to play when you export individual tracks?
 
Hmmm... it seems the difference can be more than just a header.

From "The Cart Chunk standard" by Kevin McNamara, CNE
Radio Magazine, Mar. 2002
Compatibility between the files produced by digital audio production and storage equipment has been a major obstacle for engineers attempting to mix and match products from different manufacturers within a facility. Within the past few years, a great deal of progress has been made in the creation of a uniform set of standards for files that are interchangeable. The WAV format has become the basis upon which these new standards were created. The European Broadcast Union (EBU) led the development for the standard called Broadcast Wave File (.BWF), which expanded the basic WAV format to include meta information, permitting a wide range of flexibility with respect to the types of different audio file formats and other information that can be exchanged.

While it was important to have this level of audio compatibility between different types of equipment, files created and stored in digital file formats lacked perhaps the most useful and familiar attribute: how to identify the content of the file? More importantly, how can this information be exchanged with different digital audio equipment, i.e. between digital audio workstations and storage systems?

In the recent past, most every station used a cart machine to play spots and, in fact, some time between the elimination of turntables and the acceptance of broadcast-specific CD player machines in the studio, many stations put music on carts. The rationale to use carts for music revolved around an ever shorter music rotation and the program director's desire to make sure the jock doesn't play the wrong cut. Another advantage of the cart was that each one could be labeled with a cornucopia of information that ultimately needed to be transferred to a music or program log.

Digital audio storage systems make short work of the job of logging information specific to the particular commercial spot or music cuts. In a perfect world, data indicating what was run and when should automatically be transferred to/from the appropriate traffic or music rotation system.

Earlier versions of digital audio workstations generally provided a means to enter several pieces of information about the particular track within its audio file; however, in many cases the file was created in a proprietary format not compatible with the system that would ultimately store the track for replay. Worse yet, the information about that track was difficult, if not impossible, to export into third party traffic and/or music rotation systems."

WAV files

The origin of the .WAV (waveform data) file is defined in the Resource Interchange File Format (RIFF) developed jointly by Microsoft and IBM as "a means of storing digital audio files." WAV files can support either Pulse Code Modulated (PCM) non-compressed audio or other compressed encoding schemes, such as MPEG, ADPCM or G.721. RIFF files define a structured framework that may contain other existing data formats and specifies the layout of certain public chunks with respect to order, what type?, etc. These formats are typically related, but not limited to, the storage and delivery digital multimedia files. Examples of existing file formats that are stored within the RIFF framework include Audio-visual interleaved data (.AVI), MIDI information (.RMI), Animated Cursor (.ANI), Waveform data (.WAV) and of course the Broadcast Wave File. Consider that RIFF files are simply a framework that hosts a collection of chunks."

What is a chunk?

By definition, a chunk is "self-contained collection of data in a RIFF file." Specifically, the data takes the form of a fixed length string that contains a 4-character chunk identifier spelled out in alphanumeric text such as "cart," followed by a 32-bit chunk length indicator which describes the size of the data portion of the chunk. Chunks provide a simple and effective method to embed and distribute different types of information within the standard .WAV (or .BWF) formats.

In addition to the cart chunk proposal, which is also called AES-X87 International standards organizations such as the EBU and the Audio Engineering Society (AES) have proposed a new chunk, AES-31, that permits wave files to carry multichannel audio plus information and a chunk that can be used with audio files specific to the film industry.

Its name, likely derived from the information that was found on the labels attached to carts, the "Cart" Chunk format provides a means to embed basic radio traffic information and continuity data within a BWF file. The Cart Chunk standard currently provides 20 fields of information...

The Cart Chunk standard is currently under final review by the SC-06-01 committee on file formats with the expectation of full adoption in late 2002. At this point, several manufacturers of digital equipment have included the Cart Chunk into its data. To learn more about the Cart Chunk standard point your browser to www.cartchunk.org.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top